Originally posted by steerpikeDon't recall defending male circumcision. Both are unnecessary and both are a violations against innocence. Although a man is still able to achieve orgasm, even after circumcision, while a female is not.
Exactly the same arguments are advanced for female and male circumcision. It is our custom, it is our religion, it is cleaner, it looks better, it prevents inappropriate sexual feelings.
You can't logically defend male circumcision while calling female circumcision backward and an abuse of power. Both are wrong.
I'm thankful I had all girls so it wasn't something I had to consider doing. If my youngest had been a boy her father was determined to circumcise him, while I was against it. Could have been an ugly situation all in the name of misconception.
Thank heaven for little girls. 🙂
1 edit
Originally posted by StarValleyWyI will try to make myself clear.
Ok.
Why do you defend "boys" skins and attack "girls"? Or have I mis-interpreted you again?
If an adult decides to cut off part of his penis or her clitoris because they think it will look cute or they think God wants them to, I have no objections.
Non-medical circumcison on children - who can not give informed consent - for this mutilation is always wrong. Wrong for females, wrong for males.
So if you defend male circumcision as acceptable - you can not criticise those who circumcise females.
Both are evil and the battle against female circumcision must also include male circumcision.
Originally posted by steerpikeBut, as mokko says, female circumcision is actually worse from a physiological/biological point of view, which is probably why so many people are against it.
I will try to make myself clear.
If an adult decides to cut off part of his penis or her clitoris because they think it will look cute or they think God wants them to, I have no objections.
Non-medical circumcison on children - who can not give informed consent - for this mutilation is always wrong. Wrong for females, wrong for males.
So if you de ...[text shortened]...
Both are evil and the battle against female circumcision must also include male circumcision.
Originally posted by steerpikeWell said. Complete dicks or nothing!
I will try to make myself clear.
If an adult decides to cut off part of his penis or her clitoris because they think it will look cute or they think God wants them to, I have no objections.
Non-medical circumcison on children - who can not give informed consent - for this mutilation is always wrong. Wrong for females, wrong for males.
So if you de ...[text shortened]...
Both are evil and the battle against female circumcision must also include male circumcision.
1 edit
Originally posted by steerpikeYea. That makes much better sense when sober. I can't argue with equality for all.
I will try to make myself clear.
If an adult decides to cut off part of his penis or her clitoris because they think it will look cute or they think God wants them to, I have no objections.
Non-medical circumcison on children - who ...[text shortened]... e against female circumcision must also include male circumcision.
Sorry. I might have over-stepped into the un-polite realm again. God knows I have been known to hitch-hike there a bit.
1 edit
Originally posted by mokkoWell I have one biological son, made the decision NOT to get him cut.
Don't recall defending male circumcision. Both are unnecessary and both are a violations against innocence. Although a man is still able to achieve orgasm, even after circumcision, while a female is not.
I'm thankful I had all girls so ...[text shortened]... n the name of misconception.
Thank heaven for little girls. 🙂
Now he is 25 and is bitching the girls dont like it or somethng, HE had a son , Calib, and HAD him cut. Go figure.
1 edit
Originally posted by sonhouseWow! You really do have a marvelous commincations link to your kids.
Well I have one biological son, made the decision NOT to get him cut.
Now he is 25 and is bitching the girls dont like it or somethng, HE had a son , Calib, and HAD him cut. Go figure.
svw ponders talking about dick skins with his son.
Wow. I wish I could do that. <giggle> Sorry Don. Couldn't resist.
BTW You and I made the same decision concerning circumsion even with a precision that might bring division. Yo.
2 edits
Originally posted by sonhouseOf course they would. Well. Depending if they were coming or going.
liked that one eh! like that old bluegrass song,
Hard ain't it Hard.
Not easy to tell in a spacesuit!
BTW, in space would they call it Outercourse?
Of course. On course. of course... Intercourse? errrrr..... Sorry. Just being course. Of course. What recourse do you claim? Reverse course?