1 edit
This is in response to this post above on page 3 of Trump War Chest, which reads as follows. ( Hillary having committed the 3 crimes listed in that thread.)
"Comparing Hilary with Trump is like comparing night with day. They are absolutely nothing a like Trump has her beat by a country mile when it comes to being charged with his bad conduct. Look at the charges 34 of them he was found guilty of, then we could mention the storming of the white house instigated by Trump who was going to march with them, but cowardly went to watch it on T.V., did nothing when they were chanting about hanging the V.P......That is just a few of the things, his follower are a bunch of sheep in my humble opinion. Hell, I am happy to be Canadian the direction that America appears to be heading. Lets hope there are enough to ensure he doesn't get to be POTUS again or the world will suffer for it." End of post.
Now, If Sam hates Jack and screams 'DIE!!!!" with each thrust of the knife as he murders him, he is in fact stabbing with intent to murder....Thirty Four Times. He intends to murder each time that he emotes 'Die!'
But yet, he will only be charged with one crime of murder, or intent to murder, whether Jack dies or not. Why is he not charged with 34 crimes of intent to murder??? .?
I hope this is helpful.
@AverageJoe1 saidIn the State of New York, if you make or cause to be made 34 different false entries in the business records of an enterprise with intent to commit another crime or to aid or conceal the commission thereof, you have committed the crime of Falsifying Business Records in the First Degree (NY Penal Law sec. 175.10) 34 separate times.
This is in response to this post above on page 3 of Trump War Chest, which reads as follows. ( Hillary having committed the 3 crimes listed in that thread.)
"Comparing Hilary with Trump is like comparing night with day. They are absolutely nothing a like Trump has her beat by a country mile when it comes to being charged with his bad conduct. Look at the charges 34 of ...[text shortened]... es or not. Why is he not charged with 34 crimes of intent to murder??? .?
I hope this is helpful.
I hope this is helpful.
@no1marauder saidExactly!!! Explained much better than I did!
In the State of New York, if you make or cause to be made 34 different false entries in the business records of an enterprise with intent to commit another crime or to aid or conceal the commission thereof, you have committed the crime of Falsifying Business Records in the First Degree (NY Penal Law sec. 175.10) 34 separate times.
I hope this is helpful.
Always nice to have a lawyer in the house! 🙂
-VR
@no1marauder saidYes, that is correct. However., a modicum of common sense, logic and rationale, may have a place here, given the ludicrous application of skewed legal manipulation, done to arrive at anything they can throw at this man. The Supreme Court will likely read what I just wrote and give it some thought, as they also look at the promise of the NYC Bragg who, in Russian fashion, said just find me the man, I will find the crime. He and Fani, in 2 separate persecutions, have stated the same thing...... Having both of them, or their lieutenants, visited the WH for marching orders, following them perfectly.
In the State of New York, if you make or cause to be made 34 different false entries in the business records of an enterprise with intent to commit another crime or to aid or conceal the commission thereof, you have committed the crime of Falsifying Business Records in the First Degree (NY Penal Law sec. 175.10) 34 separate times.
I hope this is helpful.
But they will be met at Waterloo.
Then, a non-felon in the WH.
@AverageJoe1 saidLOL...>Do you think the Supreme Court is looking at what you are saying on a forum chess Site? 😛 🙂
Yes, that is correct. However., a modicum of common sense, logic and rationale, may have a place here, given the ludicrous application of skewed legal manipulation, done to arrive at anything they can throw at this man. The Supreme Court will likely read what I just wrote and give it some thought, as they also look at the promise of the NYC Bragg who, in Russian fashio ...[text shortened]... ers, following them perfectly.
But they will be met at Waterloo.
Then, a non-felon in the WH.
You a TRUE TRUMP SUPPORTER...Everyone against his wrong doing is corrupt in your own little mind, I find that hilarious! God forbid they give that lunatic the power of POTUS again! May God watch over all of us, even the TRUMP supporters who are easily led like puppets.
-VR
@AverageJoe1 saidThere is no confusion.
This is in response to this post above on page 3 of Trump War Chest, which reads as follows. ( Hillary having committed the 3 crimes listed in that thread.)
"Comparing Hilary with Trump is like comparing night with day. They are absolutely nothing a like Trump has her beat by a country mile when it comes to being charged with his bad conduct. Look at the charges 34 of ...[text shortened]... es or not. Why is he not charged with 34 crimes of intent to murder??? .?
I hope this is helpful.
trump is a convicted felon.
End of.
@no1marauder said" intent to commit another crime "
In the State of New York, if you make or cause to be made 34 different false entries in the business records of an enterprise with intent to commit another crime or to aid or conceal the commission thereof, you have committed the crime of Falsifying Business Records in the First Degree (NY Penal Law sec. 175.10) 34 separate times.
I hope this is helpful.
that elusive "another crime"...that wasnt
@Very-Rusty saidput your dresses back in the closet
LOL...>Do you think the Supreme Court is looking at what you are saying on a forum chess Site? 😛 🙂
You a TRUE TRUMP SUPPORTER...Everyone against his wrong doing is corrupt in your own little mind, I find that hilarious! God forbid they give that lunatic the power of POTUS again! May God watch over all of us, even the TRUMP supporters who are easily led like puppets.
-VR
@Mott-The-Hoople saidFunny, the jury unanimously found otherwise.
" intent to commit another crime "
that elusive "another crime"...that wasnt
@no1marauder saidNo, they really didn't. They were doing something else and succeeded (for the moment). Remember ole AvJoe......you libs will win in the end. Everything you change stays changed. Changing definitions of words , such as a tip is not what a tip used to be for. It is something else now. Soon you will have us tipping a kiosk.
Funny, the jury unanimously found otherwise.
Unanimously???? Did Marauder just say unanimously? Does he know that the liberal judge changed the definition of unanimously? There was nothing unanimous about it. What a laugh.
Marauder, if you watched FOX news you would know the judicial manipulation of how the jury might find a 'unanimous' decision. The judge qualified how they might arrive at it. You know, 'not exactly' unanimous, their thinking only had to go to a certain level,,,,,,,,,with options!!! Judge Roy Bean in the west, all over again.
@TheListener saidAnother wackjob dump loves the stupid.
No, they really didn't. They were doing something else and succeeded (for the moment). Remember ole AvJoe......you libs will win in the end. Everything you change stays changed. Changing definitions of words , such as a tip is not what a tip used to be for. It is something else now. Soon you will have us tipping a kiosk.
Unanimously???? Did Marauder just say unani ...[text shortened]... y had to go to a certain level,,,,,,,,,with options!!! Judge Roy Bean in the west, all over again.
@AverageJoe1 saidAre you going to make the same asinine defense of his having purloined boxes and boxes of classified documents and refused to hand them over and moved them around to obstruct justice and conceal them from lawful searches? Was that, in your opinion, only one offense, not several?
This is in response to this post above on page 3 of Trump War Chest, which reads as follows. ( Hillary having committed the 3 crimes listed in that thread.)
"Comparing Hilary with Trump is like comparing night with day. They are absolutely nothing a like Trump has her beat by a country mile when it comes to being charged with his bad conduct. Look at the charges 34 of ...[text shortened]... es or not. Why is he not charged with 34 crimes of intent to murder??? .?
I hope this is helpful.
Here's a summary of the indictments pending:
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-61084161
If he's put in jail for only one felony, instead of 77 others too, I'll be satisfied.
@TheListener saidFrom the instructions Judge Merchan gave the jury:
No, they really didn't. They were doing something else and succeeded (for the moment). Remember ole AvJoe......you libs will win in the end. Everything you change stays changed. Changing definitions of words , such as a tip is not what a tip used to be for. It is something else now. Soon you will have us tipping a kiosk.
Unanimously???? Did Marauder just say unani ...[text shortened]... y had to go to a certain level,,,,,,,,,with options!!! Judge Roy Bean in the west, all over again.
"Your verdict, on each count you consider, whether guilty or
not guilty, must be unanimous; that is, each and every juror must
agree to it."
https://www.nycourts.gov/LegacyPDFS/press/PDFs/People%20v.%20DJT%20Jury%20Instructions%20and%20Charges%20FINAL%205-23-24.pdf
at P. 49
@TheListener saidCreating your own reality, eh?
No, they really didn't. They were doing something else and succeeded (for the moment). Remember ole AvJoe......you libs will win in the end. Everything you change stays changed. Changing definitions of words , such as a tip is not what a tip used to be for. It is something else now. Soon you will have us tipping a kiosk.
Unanimously???? Did Marauder just say unani ...[text shortened]... y had to go to a certain level,,,,,,,,,with options!!! Judge Roy Bean in the west, all over again.
Problem is, there are recorded facts.
So stop the gas lighting.
Just realise, you don’t like what’s happened. You don’t have to. But you really just sound deranged when bring forth arguments that it didn’t happen at all.