26 May 14
Originally posted by ZahlanziYeah he comes across pretty good in these interviews.
It is a very old bit, but immensely educational. Another president that people mock for being an intelligent, comprehensible person.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7DI7u-TytRU
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3L2513JFJsY
But that doesn't change the fact that Bill and Hillary Clinton are just awful, horrible, unscrupulous people that only care about political power.
They suck.
26 May 14
Originally posted by Krod Mandoonbased on what. i understand that we tend to portray people we don't like negatively. yet, what did they do to merit the "awful, horrible, unscrupulous" epithets?
Yeah he comes across pretty good in these interviews.
But that doesn't change the fact that Bill and Hillary Clinton are just awful, horrible, unscrupulous people that only care about political power.
They suck.
if you would compare them with bush and cheney who triggered a war based on a motive supported by not one shred of evidence, what would they deserve as epithets ?
27 May 14
Originally posted by ZahlanziClinton wasn't particularly impressive in those interviews except for individuals who really wanted to see things his way. He tended to appear like an angry child, not the chief executive of the United States.
It is a very old bit, but immensely educational. Another president that people mock for being an intelligent, comprehensible person.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7DI7u-TytRU
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3L2513JFJsY
27 May 14
Originally posted by normbenignyou are becoming less and less in touch with reality lately.
Clinton wasn't particularly impressive in those interviews except for individuals who really wanted to see things his way. He tended to appear like an angry child, not the chief executive of the United States.
first of all he wasn't the chief executive then, he was a former president getting interviewed.
secondly, he wasn't an angry child, he very calmly called the foxer on his crap and tactics to goad him. he was called there to talk about his charity initiatives and then osama comes up, of which he aquited himself admirably.
and if half what clinton says he did about osama is true, he really did do much more than bush did.
he spoke well, he didn't engage in verbal abuse(except when he called the interviewer's surprise attack crap), he gave intelligent responses, he navigated well enough from the terrorist attacks back to his charities and the work he is trying to do.
he isn't the second coming of jesus. but just try and compare this interview to everytime dubya struggled to make a speech. you could practically see cheney's hand up his ass, working him like a puppet.