Go back
Cloneburgers

Cloneburgers

Debates

Vote Up
Vote Down

Latest thing in the USA .. what do you think?

Vote Up
Vote Down

well I guess thats all in how you look at it. Now it would be a great idea if the cows they clone taste delicious, but if they clone cows that taste like crap then, well you see where I'm going with this.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by jammer
Latest thing in the USA .. what do you think?
It seems the best case scenario is that the average cut of meat out there could get better, but at the same time also more expensive, which from the producers point of view would be a good thing as it would introduce a more profitable industry. The most immediate downside seems to be that large scale cloning would also increase the dependence on factory style meat farming. Veal anyone?

When I first read this I thought it was about the hydroponic idea of growing meat as tissue cultures in a nutrient bath, which would be the most ultimate form of sci fi meat production. Forget penned up animals and the whole life/death/slaughtering/harvesting cycle. Just grow your steak in a dish and serve when ready.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by jammer
Latest thing in the USA .. what do you think?
Latest thing? Mcdonalds have been cloning crap burgers for years!

Vote Up
Vote Down

Whoops! Just realised what I've done. Sorry Mcdonalds - please don't sue me. What I meant to type was "Mcdonalds have been cloning great tasting, highly nutricious, wonderful value burgers for years"

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by mancityboy
Whoops! Just realised what I've done. Sorry Mcdonalds - please don't sue me. What I meant to type was "Mcdonalds have been cloning great tasting, highly nutricious, wonderful value burgers for years"
I think they can still sue for sarcasm.


Edit: Or for the very least, taking the piss.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by kmax87
It seems the best case scenario is that the average cut of meat out there could get better, but at the same time also more expensive, which from the producers point of view would be a good thing as it would introduce a more profitable industry. The most immediate downside seems to be that large scale cloning would also increase the dependence on factory style ...[text shortened]... e life/death/slaughtering/harvesting cycle. Just grow your steak in a dish and serve when ready.
as there's no brain attached, you could clone people cells and sell peopleburgers.

tastes like pork, they say.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by zeeblebot
as there's no brain attached, you could clone people cells and sell peopleburgers.

tastes like pork, they say.
mmmm! porcine produce mmmmm!

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by kmax87
When I first read this I thought it was about the hydroponic idea of growing meat as tissue cultures in a nutrient bath, which would be the most ultimate form of sci fi meat production. Forget penned up animals and the whole life/death/slaughtering/harvesting cycle. Just grow your steak in a dish and serve when ready.
About 20 years ago I read a 2000AD comic that dealt with this issue in graphic detail: animals in tanks, just the enormous body and the head, no pain, slice the meat as required. "Beeves", they called them. And why not? (Bleugh).

Latest concern with meat, after steroids and hormones, is antibiotics...

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by zeeblebot
as there's no brain attached, you could clone people cells and sell peopleburgers.

tastes like pork, they say.
I'm in favour of animal-vegetable hybrids. Pork-corn, steak-onion...

Vote Up
Vote Down

if the cloning is done right, a clone would be no different from the real one(hence the name clone)

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Zahlanzi
if the cloning is done right, a clone would be no different from the real one(hence the name clone)
umm ummm ... much better than those kangaroo-burgers over at Jack in the Box.