21 Feb 07
Originally posted by princeoforangeNot me.
Redmike, was it you that was on Radio 4 a couple of months ago berating the principle of the Rule of Law? It was someone called Michael Collins from Glasgow.
But if it was, we'd have a problem in that you'd have breached the ToS by giving out my name.
But it wasn't me anyway.
22 Feb 07
Originally posted by princeoforangeThis statement is remarkable.
OK, my apologies. Anyone could have found out your name if it was you anyway because it was broadcast on radio 4.
Prince, if you do not understand why this is a most bizarre form of twisted logic perhaps you need to re-evaluate your methods of reasoning.
22 Feb 07
1 edit
Originally posted by WheelyWell he didn't specifically ID redmike, redmike actually ID'd himself from my reading. Prince asked redmike if that was him with name X on a radio show, I am unfamiliar with those numbers, 4 and such but Redmike could have just as easily said, nope that's not me and not pointed out that name was the same as his. When I read it, I did not automatically assume redmike was X from Glasgow because Prince did not make a blanket statement, 'Redmike is X from G'. It's not quite the same thing.
This statement is remarkable.
Prince, if you do not understand why this is a most bizarre form of twisted logic perhaps you need to re-evaluate your methods of reasoning.
22 Feb 07
Originally posted by sonhouseDid I ID myself? I thought I specifically said it wasn't me.
Well he didn't specifically ID redmike, redmike actually ID'd himself from my reading. Prince asked redmike if that was him with name X on a radio show, I am unfamiliar with those numbers, 4 and such but Redmike could have just as easily said, nope that's not me and not pointed out that name was the same as his. When I read it, I did not automatically assum ...[text shortened]... ce did not make a blanket statement, 'Redmike is X from G'. It's not quite the same thing.
22 Feb 07
1 edit
Originally posted by RedmikeThat's not what I meant, I mean you seem to have been saying your real name really was X from G even if it was another X on radio 4 or implying prince was calling you by the right name. You did not say,
Did I ID myself? I thought I specifically said it wasn't me.
"my name is not X from G', you said why are you broadcasting my name, which tells me that is your real name even if it's a differant guy on radio 4.
22 Feb 07
Originally posted by sonhouseOK, let me clarify.
That's not what I meant, I mean you seem to have been saying your real name really was X from G even if it was another X on radio 4 or implying prince was calling you by the right name. You did not say,
"my name is not X from G', you said why are you broadcasting my name, which tells me that is your real name even if it's a differant guy on radio 4.
My name is not Michael Collins.
I did not appear on Radio 4.
My point is that, if it had been me, PoO would have given out my name.
Therefore he shouldn't have posted the name - in case it was me.
22 Feb 07
1 edit
Originally posted by sonhouseI think it is obvious what redmike's first name is, and that he is a communist from Glasgow, but he explicitly states that he wasn't the bloke on radio4, but that IF he was him it would breach the ToS.
That's not what I meant, I mean you seem to have been saying your real name really was X from G even if it was another X on radio 4 or implying prince was calling you by the right name. You did not say,
"my name is not X from G', you said why are you broadcasting my name, which tells me that is your real name even if it's a differant guy on radio 4.
edit: redmike already answered above