Originally posted by sasquatch672It was an exact copy of a question that Delmer posted !
Why are you persisting in this? This is such a painfully banal conversation. Del has the restraint to simply point the uselessness of whatever it is you're trying to do. I for one don't get you.
Originally posted by coentjeGreat then I can post the word "STANG" in every sexist, racist and otherwise demeaning thread that moderators currently allow.
can't they adjust the "ModBot" to automatically delete every thread and post where the word Stang in occurs.
that might make these boring and annoying threads dissapear.
Originally posted by Sambo69What he is saying is:
BelgianFreak,
You made 2 allegations:
(1) STANG included a link to a picture more than once
(2) STANG continued to write about the same theme
Regarding (1) -
(a) Can you honestly say that you issued STANG a specific warning not to include a link to the picture ?
(b) Would you have preferred that STANG found new pictures of other horrifying th ...[text shortened]... pinion is on Bush and what's happening in Iraq, etc - Are you honestly neutral ?
Sambo69
Stang was on short leash, he screwed up, and now he is banned for good.
Think of it like house arrest--if they even detect alcohol from a mouthwash in your system you butt is going to jail.
Originally posted by Sambo69I really couldn't care less if you would be one or not. But if you would become a moderator i think that you might be going against your own principles because looking at the things that you have posted i seriously doubt you could be unbiased and fair in your moderation
So you're OK with me being a moderator ?
Originally posted by coentjeJust because I share the feelings of billions of other people - such as Bush being corrupt, a war monger and a threat to our security - doesn't mean that I wouldn't be a good moderator.
I really couldn't care less if you would be one or not. But if you would become a moderator i think that you might be going against your own principles because looking at the things that you have posted i seriously doubt you could be unbiased and fair in your moderation
Originally posted by Sambo69Ah, but i agree with you on the bush side of your story, i just disagree with the way you and that other one are trying to shove your opinions down everyones throat.
Just because I share the feelings of billions of other people - such as Bush being corrupt, a war monger and a threat to our security - doesn't mean that I wouldn't be a good moderator.
This debate was not about what your views on Bush are but about the fact that you thought that that other guy was unfairly banned.
Reading a lot of posts and threads about this guy already does make me come to the conclusion that he was justly banned for his actions and not for his views. Especially because there are plenty of people with the same views as he has that have not been banned.
So his actions brought this on him and will bring this on him again and again, not just in this forum but in every single place on the web and in the real world as well.
You would not be a good moderator because you believe this guy beyond all doubt, no matter what is being told and being reveiled by others. You would not be a good moderator because you close your mind for everything but your own opinion and ideas. That is why i think you will not be a good moderator, not because of your ideas and opinions but because of the exclusion of everything and everyone that does not agree with them.