Originally posted by BigDoggProblemYour bet will lose. Again.
I'll bet you're taking another trip there tonite, via the Clydesdales.
Edit: Go to www.uchess.com, register, and I'll show you how fast chess is supposed to be played.
I really am amused at your attempt to be a mighty "chimp winner" by the simple act of claiming a win because I was in rome.
Nice try. What do you think about ethical problems in general?
Is it ok to guess on a question in a finals exam?
Originally posted by StarValleyWyHow the hell should I know where you are? As your location says, "Couldn't Prove It." And I bet there's places with internet access, even in Rome.
Your bet will lose. Again.
I really am amused at your attempt to be a mighty "chimp winner" by the simple act of claiming a win because I was in rome.
Nice try. What do you think about ethical problems in general?
Is it ok to guess on a question in a finals exam?
Quit making excuses, ya loser.
2 edits
Originally posted by BigDoggProblemIt never occured to you do as Woolburger did? In my game with him? To simply send a prompt and wait?
How the hell should I know where you are? As your location says, "Couldn't Prove It." And I bet there's places with internet access, even in Rome.
Quit making excuses, ya loser.
Woolburger seems to have it way over on you in that "ethical" thing. But that translates to "Fear". Doesn't it?
Originally posted by StarValleyWyI was going to give you the opportunity to prove you can finish a game to the end this time instead of running off to Rome with your tail between your legs. But I can understand if you lack the stones to face me again. Don't sweat it.
No. Should I? I really hate chess. Why should I care? About you and your silly "win at any cost" chimp mates? Hell. You "won" while I was in Rome. Don't you feel good and powerful for your "win"?
1 edit
Originally posted by BigDoggProblemIn your silly wet dreams.
I was going to give you the opportunity to prove you can finish a game to the end this time instead of running off to Rome with your tail between your legs. But I can understand if you lack the stones to face me again. Don't sweat it.
I'll probably concede if you can use your "engine" to set it up again. Without fear of having some brave soul see who used the engine. Me. Or You?
Snark. But give it a try. If you want. I'm game for a 112 move "draw by the 50 move rule". But i would prefer to just "lose". That is the honorable "human" way out. We all lose. Eventually. I am not too proud to just do it now. As Practice. Good practice for the real thing.
Originally posted by StarValleyWyLet's not play off anyone else's game this time.
In your silly wet dreams.
I'll probably concede if you can use your "engine" to set it up again. Without fear of having some brave soul see who used the engine. Me. Or You?
Snark. But give it a try. If you want. I'm game for a 112 move "draw by the 50 move rule".
Go to uChess.com, register, and I'll meet you there. That way I don't have to be up until one in the morning waiting for a game to finish.
Originally posted by BigDoggProblemwhy?
Let's not play off anyone else's game this time.
Go to uChess.com, register, and I'll meet you there. That way I don't have to be up until one in the morning waiting for a game to finish.
You assume I want to play chess. You further compound your stupidity by assuming i want to play YOU.
Why? Why would I want to play chess?
The only reason I offered the "finish" against an enemy was for the sake of entertainment and a raw laugh against my foe.
You took what you didn't earn. Are you proud?
Originally posted by StarValleyWyOh, but you do. Even though you hate chess, you still want to play. Pathetic, isn't it?
why?
You assume I want to play chess. You further compound your stupidity by assuming i want to play YOU.
Why? Why would I want to play chess?
The only reason I offered the "finish" against an enemy was for the sake of entertainment and a raw laugh against my foe.
You took what you didn't earn. Are you proud?
I think that loss got to you. You haven't been able to shut up about it. Let that be a lesson to you: never give the opponent the satisfaction of knowing that.
Originally posted by jimmyb270
Yes, to quote the article:
[b]'...it was found that the computer game only stimulated activity in the parts of the brain associated with vision and movement.
In contrast, arithmetic stimulated brain activity in both the left and right hemispheres of the frontal lobe - the area of the brain most associated with learning, memory and emotion.'
what's wrong with stimulating "activity in the parts of the brain associated with vision and movement"? ...
2 edits
Originally posted by AynatI rather doubt it.
An interesting article...
http://observer.guardian.co.uk/international/story/0,6903,539166,00.html
Debate?
I think they are making the oldest mistake in logic. Getting their cause and effect mixed up.
I can't imagine an intelligent person playing computer games. It seems anathema. But hey! I was wrong a couple of times.
<Knock Knock>
Who ist it?
-Me. Albert. Enrico eh? You wanna play a few 'puter' games eh?
No. Go away. I don't vant to play!
-Albert. Don't a be likea that. Let's a play a game.
No. Go away. I'm busy.
-Ok. If you' a sure. You' a not a lot of fun these days Albert.
Go away! Go away! Got Damerang! Go away. I don't want to play zees silly games!
- Ok, ok... you don't a' have to be so damned stuck'up about it!
ANOTHER DAY AT PRINCETON... WHAT MIGHT HAVE BEEN. Or "Advanced studies my ass. Just go away!"