Originally posted by flyUnityI'd be more likely to vote for a woman than a man, and a black person than a white person, all else being equal.
According to Dick Morris ( http://www.newsmax.com/adv/jan05/ ) Condi Rice is the only person who will be able to stop Hillary from gaining the Oval office in 08, what do you think? would you vote for her?
I don't know enough about either Rice or Hillary to decide whether I would vote for either. In addition, I don't know who their opposition would be.
Originally posted by AThousandYoungI will tell you this, I would vote for a rock before I voted Codaleeza Rice. She is so much in the back pocket of the oil industry that she has a oil tanker named after her, and that's no lie.
I'd be more likely to vote for a woman than a man, and a black person than a white person, all else being equal.
I don't know enough about either Rice or Hillary to decide whether I would vote for either. In addition, I don't know who their opposition would be.
Originally posted by flyUnityCondi is a Republican. Hillary is a Democrat.
According to Dick Morris ( http://www.newsmax.com/adv/jan05/ ) Condi Rice is the only person who will be able to stop Hillary from gaining the Oval office in 08, what do you think? would you vote for her?
Republicans = supreme evil
Democrats = moderate goodness
I'd vote for Hillary.
I can tell she's got some major attitude workin inside her head. SHe wants ta let loose and all. She wants to say "Yo, Syria, it's gonna be up side yo head if you don't get outta Lebanon cuz I gots me a cowboy behind me just dying ta go postal. Ya dig?" If she would say that, it would all be over. Excuse me, ova.
Originally posted by DoctorScribblesNo way could Rice beat Clinton. Half of the South and Midwest wouldn't bother to show up. Some of the Republican base in these areas might be persuaded to come out and vote for a woman, but a black woman? No way, there is a reason why these states are "backwards."
Rice v. Clinton would be the fatal blow to the Democratic party. They would lose and never recover.
Who wants to wager on it? I'll take any comers except bbarr, who is a deadbeat who reneged on our previous wager.
1 edit
Originally posted by telerionWhen was the last time anybody voted for anybody in a Presidential election?
Some of the Republican base in these areas might be persuaded to come out and vote for a woman, but a black woman?
They wouldn't come out to vote for Rice. They would come out to vote against a rich bitch from New York whose husband violated family values by having an affair and lying about it.
Originally posted by DoctorScribblesYou might be right. If there is one thing that can overcame hatred and bigotry, it's even greater hatred and bigotry.
When was the last time anybody voted for anybody in a Presidential election?
They wouldn't come out to vote for Rice. They would come out to vote against a rich bitch from New York whose husband violated family values by having an affair and lying about it.
Originally posted by DoctorScribblesDoctorScribbles, have you considered the possibility that Bbarr is awaiting the year of jubilee, the appointed time in the biblical era when all debts were erased? I know while it may feel good to him, it does nothing to teach him about responsible behavior and accountibility.
Rice v. Clinton would be the fatal blow to the Democratic party. They would lose and never recover.
Who wants to wager on it? I'll take any comers except bbarr, who is a deadbeat who reneged on our previous wager.
I apologize if this post has in some way violated the decorum of our new forum system in which all religious concepts are posted in the spirituality forum.
Originally posted by flyUnityI'd vote Libertarian. In fact, I WILL vote Libertarian. But I'd be interested in everyone's opinion on who would make the strongest VP candidates on each ticket.
According to Dick Morris ( http://www.newsmax.com/adv/jan05/ ) Condi Rice is the only person who will be able to stop Hillary from gaining the Oval office in 08, what do you think? would you vote for her?
1 edit
Originally posted by DoctorScribblesI agree. Hillary won't win a single state in the south and will probably lose more votes in the West and North than Kerry did. She'll get whipped worse than Dukakis.
Rice v. Clinton would be the fatal blow to the Democratic party. They would lose and never recover.
Who wants to wager on it? I'll take any comers except bbarr, who is a deadbeat who reneged on our previous wager.
The Dems need to grow a brain.
The only hope for the dems is to find another Bill Clinton. A smooth talking, bible carrying, good looking, southern democrat that can talk out of both sides of his mouth at the same time.
Edit: And it wouldn't matter who Hillary was running against. Bob Dole could come back and kick her @ss. Hell David Duke could beat her.