Looks like O'Bammy ain't the lame duck he should be at this point in the game.
A week before the 'out with the old crooks, in with the new ones' inauguration of D. Trump, he decides to move an entire armored brigade to the border, practically daring Putin to blink.
All because, you know, they hacked us and stuff.
Maybe we should preemptively inaugurate Trump and throw the old crooks out before anything stupider happens.
Originally posted by FreakyKBHIf Donald Trump did this same thing you'd be singing his praises for "standing up to America's enemy's" Hypocrisy is a difficult thing to hide.
Looks like O'Bammy ain't the lame duck he should be at this point in the game.
A week before the 'out with the old crooks, in with the new ones' inauguration of D. Trump, he decides to move an entire armored brigade to the border, practically daring Putin to blink.
All because, you know, they hacked us and stuff.
Maybe we should preemptively inaugurate Trump and throw the old crooks out before anything stupider happens.
Originally posted by mchillWould war with Russia be preferable to letting Trump take the reigns?
If Donald Trump did this same thing you'd be singing his praises for "standing up to America's enemy's" Hypocrisy is a difficult thing to hide.
Maybe this whole story was designed to start a war.
I have to say though, Obama only seems willing to attack foes who have no real way of fighting back. like Gaddafi Mr. Nobel Peace Prize winner is a coward and a bully. Most bullies are.
Originally posted by mchillIn order to "stand up to" an aggressor, it is a critical component for the aggressor to have actually done something, um, aggressive first.
If Donald Trump did this same thing you'd be singing his praises for "standing up to America's enemy's" Hypocrisy is a difficult thing to hide.
Thus far, we have fake news reports about some vague, some nebulous, some unknown actions taken by Russia--- nearly all of which has been completely discredited as being the case.
We've not been exposed to any threat or potential threat, unlike we have been with The Crook's idiotic use of private servers.
Whatever hacking which was executed by whomever, if anything, constituted a public service: seeing these crooks' inner workings, their defrauding and manipulation of the election process, in addition to pointing a light on the perversion of the power elite... all these things we'd never know with their ability to hide behind the entrenched bureaucracy and cronyism.
13 Jan 17
Originally posted by FreakyKBHYeah... you just keep defending a foreign nation cracking your bloody country.
In order to "stand up to" an aggressor, it is a critical component for the aggressor to have actually done something, um, aggressive first.
Thus far, we have fake news reports about some vague, some nebulous, some unknown actions taken by Russia--- nearly all of which has been completely discredited as being the case.
We've not been exposed to any threat ...[text shortened]... hings we'd never know with their ability to hide behind the entrenched bureaucracy and cronyism.
Haha
I love this world.
Originally posted by shavixmirPray tell: how does one "hack" an election, exactly?
Emails, elections, intellectualism, social coherency, facts...
Your country is cracked and it's going down the drain.
What does that look like?
It's almost as though you're speaking the English language but have no clue whatsoever what you're actually saying.
Did they rig the election: put more votes into some imagined kitty than were actually cast for Trump?
(Hard to swallow, given the nearly three million more ballots cast for her.)
Did they alter the counts after the fact?
(Same problem.)
Did they intercept secret campaign strategies of the loser?
Seriously: what was gained?
Where's the proof?
15 Jan 17
Originally posted by FreakyKBHYou want stupid?
Looks like O'Bammy ain't the lame duck he should be at this point in the game.
A week before the 'out with the old crooks, in with the new ones' inauguration of D. Trump, he decides to move an entire armored brigade to the border, practically daring Putin to blink.
All because, you know, they hacked us and stuff.
Maybe we should preemptively inaugurate Trump and throw the old crooks out before anything stupider happens.
You ain't seen nothing yet.
Originally posted by FreakyKBHI think the Russians were giving Trump the debate questions beforehand to rig the election.
Pray tell: how does one "hack" an election, exactly?
What does that look like?
It's almost as though you're speaking the English language but have no clue whatsoever what you're actually saying.
Did they rig the election: put more votes into some imagined kitty than were actually cast for Trump?
(Hard to swallow, given the nearly three million more ...[text shortened]... cept secret campaign strategies of the loser?
Seriously: what was gained?
Where's the proof?
Mwhahahaha!!