03 Mar 23
A peer-reviewed scientific review, published in two parts in the Journal of Insulin Resistance calls for the immediate suspension of all COVID-19 shots as real-world data show they cause more harm than good.
https://insulinresistance.org/index.php/jir/article/view/71/224
VAERS is widely acknowledged, even by the CDC, to be vastly under reported. From their Dataguide:
"'Underreporting' is one of the main limitations of passive surveillance systems, including VAERS. The term, underreporting, refers to the fact that VAERS receives reports for only a small fraction of actual adverse events. The degree of underreporting varies widely."
https://openvaers.com/faq/what-is-underreporting-and-why-it-matters
@metal-brain saidAhh so when you cannot find evidence just claim that the evidence is invisible, gotcha 👍
A peer-reviewed scientific review, published in two parts in the Journal of Insulin Resistance calls for the immediate suspension of all COVID-19 shots as real-world data show they cause more harm than good.
https://insulinresistance.org/index.php/jir/article/view/71/224
VAERS is widely acknowledged, even by the CDC, to be vastly under reported. From their Dataguide ...[text shortened]... nderreporting varies widely."
https://openvaers.com/faq/what-is-underreporting-and-why-it-matters
Clearly the health benefits of vaccines have been underreported thus in fact they are much better for us than we thought.
Yeah I like this approach
@metal-brain saidFor a pretty thorough debunking of that article from a "journal" that hadn't published an issue since 2019 and has nothing to do with its declared areas of "Articles will focus on pathophysiology, prevention, management and advancing therapy for different patient populations with insulin resistance and related disorders" see:
A peer-reviewed scientific review, published in two parts in the Journal of Insulin Resistance calls for the immediate suspension of all COVID-19 shots as real-world data show they cause more harm than good.
https://insulinresistance.org/index.php/jir/article/view/71/224
VAERS is widely acknowledged, even by the CDC, to be vastly under reported. From their Dataguide ...[text shortened]... nderreporting varies widely."
https://openvaers.com/faq/what-is-underreporting-and-why-it-matters
https://sciencebasedmedicine.org/i-know-you-are-but-what-am-i-dr-asseem-malhotra-rails-against-covid-19-misinformation/
@no1marauder saidWorlds most jabbed country has a wuflu death rate 1 and 1/2 times that of the average.
For a pretty thorough debunking of that article from a "journal" that hadn't published an issue since 2019 and has nothing to do with its declared areas of "Articles will focus on pathophysiology, prevention, management and advancing therapy for different patient populations with insulin resistance and related disorders" see:
https://sciencebasedmedicine.org/i-know-you-are-but-what-am-i-dr-asseem-malhotra-rails-against-covid-19-misinformation/
No1's link has a picture of peewee herman as the title picture.
04 Mar 23
@no1marauder saidDavid Gorski didn't debunk anything. He is even spreading misinformation in his hit piece. He asserted natural immunity was not as good as the jab which is false. All he did was complain about the truth and falsely call it misinformation like every biased person in the cult does. Here is proof Gorski is wrong.
For a pretty thorough debunking of that article from a "journal" that hadn't published an issue since 2019 and has nothing to do with its declared areas of "Articles will focus on pathophysiology, prevention, management and advancing therapy for different patient populations with insulin resistance and related disorders" see:
https://sciencebasedmedicine.org/i-know-you-are-but-what-am-i-dr-asseem-malhotra-rails-against-covid-19-misinformation/
https://www.nbc12.com/2022/06/22/natural-immunity-offers-greater-covid-protection-than-vaccines-study-finds/
https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2118946
04 Mar 23
@metal-brain saidHey idiot how can you have natural immunity from a novel virus, by the time you get herd immunity you’ve lost a shed load of people
David Gorski didn't debunk anything. He is even spreading misinformation in his hit piece. He asserted natural immunity was not as good as the jab which is false. All he did was complain about the truth and falsely call it misinformation like every biased person in the cult does. Here is proof Gorski is wrong.
https://www.nbc12.com/2022/06/22/natural-immunity-offers-gr ...[text shortened]... r-covid-protection-than-vaccines-study-finds/
https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2118946
Here’s why your bs study is bs
“The analysis is flawed because it compares apples to oranges. The paper mixes together studies that were conducted in different environments with different transmission risks. It also combines studies where masks were worn part of the time with studies where masks are worn all the time. And it blends studies that looked at Covid-19 with studies that looked at influenza.
If apples work and oranges don’t, but your analysis mixes them together, you may come to the false conclusion that apples don’t work. Out of the 78 papers analyzed in the review, only two actually studied masking during the Covid-19 pandemic. And both of those found that masks did protect wearers from Covid-19. But these studies are drowned out by the greater number of studies on influenza included, where the benefit of masking is harder to detect because it’s a far less contagious virus than Covid-19.
Even the authors themselves acknowledge in the paper: “The high risk of bias in the trials, variation in outcome measurement, and relatively low adherence with the interventions during the studies hampers drawing firm conclusions.”
The clear problems with the study did not stop loud voices from exaggerating its findings on large platforms. Bret Stephens proclaimed in the New York Times that “The Mask Mandates Did Nothing. Will Any Lessons Be Learned?” And Tom Jefferson, first author of the Cochrane paper, asserted in an interview: “There is just no evidence that [masks] make any difference. Full stop.”
Neither are objective nor reliable sources. Stephens once called global warming “mass hysteria” and claimed climate science had been “discredited”. Jefferson works for the Brownstone Institute, a Covid-19 misinformation group that is powered by dark money.”
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2023/feb/27/dont-believe-those-who-claim-science-proves-masks-dont-work?CMP=Share_iOSApp_Other
04 Mar 23
@kevcvs57 saidmasks work kev, just not the way you wear them.
Hey idiot how can you have natural immunity from a novel virus, by the time you get herd immunity you’ve lost a shed load of people
Here’s why your bs study is bs
“The analysis is flawed because it compares apples to oranges. The paper mixes together studies that were conducted in different environments with different transmission risks. It also combines studies where m ...[text shortened]... sfree/2023/feb/27/dont-believe-those-who-claim-science-proves-masks-dont-work?CMP=Share_iOSApp_Other
04 Mar 23
1 edit
@kevcvs57 saidThe whole argument is that you're supposed to wear a mask to protect others, you've just performed a massive flip flop that's going to alienate all your buddies, shag doody, No1 Miss Representor and zahloony divegeesteer bamboozle. But I like it, it destroys any onus on people to wear masks for the sake of others. If the mask comforts you however badly you mishandle it, then go ahead wear it as much as you like.
Hey idiot
Here’s why your bs study is bs
And both of those found that masks did protect wearers from Covid-19.
04 Mar 23
@kevcvs57 saidHey idiot, this thread is about vaccines, not masks.
Hey idiot how can you have natural immunity from a novel virus, by the time you get herd immunity you’ve lost a shed load of people
Here’s why your bs study is bs
“The analysis is flawed because it compares apples to oranges. The paper mixes together studies that were conducted in different environments with different transmission risks. It also combines studies where m ...[text shortened]... sfree/2023/feb/27/dont-believe-those-who-claim-science-proves-masks-dont-work?CMP=Share_iOSApp_Other
04 Mar 23
@metal-brain saidApologies good sir, you are correct.
Hey idiot, this thread is about vaccines, not masks.
Kev you ijit bring your mask bollocks over to the other thread, and don't forget the link to the M90 mask you claim to wear.
04 Mar 23
@wajoma saidNo apology necessary. People try to digress all of the time. Kev does it because he cannot debate the subject of relevancy competently. In other words, he lost the debate being discussed and digressed in a panic in a feeble attempt to save face. That happens a lot on here.
Apologies good sir, you are correct.
Kev you ijit bring your mask bollocks over to the other thread, and don't forget the link to the M90 mask you claim to wear.