He sold the $5M in NVIDIA stock he’d bought illegally, just before the vote approving NVIDIA was passed. This is sleaze at its best. Not ONE of you turkeys will call this what it is. To avoid legal trouble, he sold at a $300K loss. To give up that kind of money, which would fuel his jet and energy bills for at least 2 months, he likely felt like a crook?
- Joined
- 23 Feb 22
- Moves
- 1798
@vivify said"Shady but not incriminating".
It was shady but not incriminating. Stock is not a body that you can just dump somewhere to hide from investigation. There's already a paper trail and records of transactions. If anything illegal was done "dumping" stock doesn't do anything.
You're stupid.
Right....
Unless your last name is Trump.
Or you are a conservative.
Or a patriot.
@vivify saidVivify. I am simply saying that his personal decision to do something quite against investment strategy (which is to buy low and sell high) is beyond highly suspect. He knew his $5M was a safe bet.
It was shady but not incriminating. Stock is not a body that you can just dump somewhere to hide from investigation. There's already a paper trail and records of transactions. If anything illegal was done "dumping" stock doesn't do anything.
You're stupid.
So, Vivify, to avoid this scandal, this investigation, he runs away. I actually do not get the point of your post, it is typical deflection. It is like the Administration calling their stuff a 'deficit reduction act', or healthcare act the 'affordable' act. Acts that are going to send inflation through the roof are called the Anti Inflation act. I wrote a few weeks ago that you fellers are changing definitions big time. Why do y'all do that? Now you yourself are saying 'shady but not incriminating'. The Feds are deliberately slowing the economy. Since you have this all figured out, can you tell us why they are doing that?
@vivify saidWhy do libs go personal on threads? All of you do. One can almost hear your squeaky voices, it is just eerie and wastes space. You must think that it shores up your points, if there are any?
It was shady but not incriminating. Stock is not a body that you can just dump somewhere to hide from investigation. There's already a paper trail and records of transactions. If anything illegal was done "dumping" stock doesn't do anything.
You're stupid.
@averagejoe1 saidAs discussed in the other thread, there was nothing illegal about the stock purchase.
He sold the $5M in NVIDIA stock he’d bought illegally, just before the vote approving NVIDIA was passed. This is sleaze at its best. Not ONE of you turkeys will call this what it is. To avoid legal trouble, he sold at a $300K loss. To give up that kind of money, which would fuel his jet and energy bills for at least 2 months, he likely felt like a crook?
@no1marauder saidThen there was nothing illegal about Martha Stewart's stock purchase.
As discussed in the other thread, there was nothing illegal about the stock purchase.
So why did she have to go to jail for it and the crooked Pelosis didn't?
https://www.rt.com/usa/483742-tulsi-burr-insider-trading/
If the chairman of the FRS doesn't buy stocks why should congress be allowed to?
Government bonds are not good enough for them? Why not? The Pelosis are wealthy. I think they can get by.