The post that was quoted here has been removedSince you're spamming and using personal attacks, I have alerted the post and hope it is removed.
I answered your question, I didn't evade it at all. That won't stop you from repeating the same thing verbatim in post after post will it? That's called "spamming".
The post that was quoted here has been removedMore spam. The same thing in five different posts! When are you ever going to start following the rules on these Forums?
Yes I answered it - once like you are supposed to. But here it is AGAIN:
"I don't care about what flunkies Biden wants. The fact that the Democratic Party chose Biden rather than more leftist candidates surely meant that his Cabinet and advisors would be quite different from those whom Bernie Sanders and/or Elizabeth Warren would have selected. And the fact that they may need Republican votes for confirmation limits his options even more."
The post that was quoted here has been removedIn case it is too hard for you to understand, my statement was one of general application. I think the President should be able to name whatever flunkies he wants to such positions unless they are grossly incompetent and/or corrupt. Being recently retired from the military and/or getting money from a corporation for being on its board doesn't make one incompetent or corrupt so ......................................................
@Duchess64 - Note No1Marauder's dishonest evasions.
ATTACK THE MATERIAL AT HAND, NOT THE POSTER.
Furthermore, your assessment of No1Marauder is purely subjective, yet you speak as some kind of authority, and is per usual, in a negative fashion.
When responding to posts in this or any forum, stick to texts that you feel need addressing. Do NOT think that the poster of said text is that which is pertinent.
The post that was quoted here has been removedIf you raise the issue *first* that shows a poster to be dishonest or hypocritical, then YES, it is Ok to say in summery that the poster has been shown to be blah blah blah
And you say I attacked you? the first thing I attacked was your methodology. Big Diff.
@earl-of-trumps saidDo you know what the purpose of Pentagon is? If so, how does this statement make sense?
I do NOT like a military man being in charge of the Pentagon, sorry. That is supposed to be a civilian position and rightfully so.