https://www.cbsnews.com/pictures/murder-map-deadliest-u-s-cities/
In America, an estimated 16,425 people were murdered in 2019. This was a 0.3% increase from the 2018 estimate.
Here are murder rates in 65 major U.S. cities (cities with greater than 100,000 residents) for 2019. These rates are calculated using the latest statistics available — the FBI's 2019 Crime in the United States data, as well as data culled directly from city police officials and the U.S. Census Bureau.
1. St. Louis, Missouri - 64.54 murders per 100,000 residents
2. Baltimore, Maryland - 58.27 per 100,000
3. Birmingham, Alabama - 50.62 per 100,000
4. Detroit, Michigan - 41.45 per 100,000
5. Dayton, Ohio - 34.18 per 100,000
6. Baton Rouge, Louisiana - 31.72 per 100,000
7. New Orleans, Louisiana - 30.67 per 100,000
8. Kansas City, Missouri - 29.88 per 100,000
9. Memphis, Tennessee - 29.21 per 100,000
10. Cleveland, Ohio - 24.09 per 100,000
11. Richmond, Virginia - 23.84 per 100,000
12. Miami Gardens, Florida - 23.64 per 100,000
13. Washington, D.C. - 23.52 per 100,000
14. North Charleston, South Carolina - 22.55 per 100,000
15. Peoria, Illinois - 22.53 per 100,000
16. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania - 22.47 per 100,000
17. Columbia, South Carolina - 21.68 per 100,000
18. San Bernardino, California - 21.23 per 100,000
19. Cincinnati, Ohio - 21.1 per 100,000
20. Columbus, Georgia - 20.94 per 100,000
21. Tuscaloosa, Alabama - 20.77 per 100,000
22. Atlanta, Georgia - 19.53 per 100,000
23. Indianapolis, Indiana - 19.51 per 100,000
24. Little Rock, Arkansas - 19.15 per 100,000
25. Shreveport, Louisiana - 18.66 per 100,000
26. Montgomery, Alabama - 18.54 per 100,000
27. Buffalo, New York - 18.38 per 100,000
28. Chicago, Illinois - 18.26 per 100,000
29. Chattanooga, Tennessee - 18.15 per 100,000
30. Newark, New Jersey - 18.08 per 100,000
31. Oakland, California - 17.97 per 100,000
32. Augusta, Georgia - 17.69 per 100,000
33. Hartford, Connecticut - 17.18 per 100,000
34. High Point, North Carolina - 16.77 per 100,000
35. Savannah, Georgia - 16.61 per 100,000
36. Milwaukee, Wisconsin - 16.41 per 100,000
37. Rochester, New York - 16.04 per 100,000
38. Beaumont, Texas - 16.03 per 100,000
39. Richmond, California - 15.38 per 100,000
40. West Palm Beach, Florida - 15.07 per 100,000
41. Albuquerque, New Mexico - 14.95 per 100,000
42. Dallas, Texas - 14.89 per 100,000
43. Norfolk, Virginia - 14.83 per 100,000
44. Greensboro, North Carolina - 14.43 per 100,000
45. Jacksonville, Florida - 14.19 per 100,000
46. Louisville, Kentucky - 13.92 per 100,000
47. South Bend, Indiana - 13.72 per 100,000
48. Tulsa, Oklahoma - 13.69 per 100,000
49. Akron, Ohio - 13.64 per 100,000
50. Newport News, Virginia - 13.53 per 100,000
51. Syracuse, New York - 13.34 per 100,000
52. Durham, North Carolina - 13.20 per 100,000
53. Paterson, New Jersey - 13.08 per 100,000
54. Springfield, Massachusetts - 12.96 per 100,000
55. Fayetteville, North Carolina - 12.76 per 100,000
56. Winston-Salem, North Carolina - 12.5 per 100,000
57. Toledo, Ohio - 12.43 per 100,000
58. Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania - 12.32 per 100,000
59. (Tie) Charlotte, North Carolina - 12.08 per 100,000
59. (Tie) Nashville, Tennessee - 12.08 per 100,000
61. Bridgeport, Connecticut - 11.73 per 100,000
62. Knoxville, Tennessee - 11.66 per 100,000
63. Oklahoma City, Oklahoma - 11.40 per 100,000
64. Fort Lauderdale, Florida - 11.37 per 100,000
65. Hampton, Virginia - 11.26 per 100,000
As you can plainly see, Chicago is 28th on this list.
Someone should tell Tucker Carlson. Chicago is Tucker's favorite, because Barrack Obama was from Chicago. But what you can see, and what Tucker doesn't want you to see, is there are plenty of whitebread cities above Chicago on this list.
Chicago, the nation's third-largest city, leads the nation with 739 homicides as of the end of November, up 3% from 2020, according to Chicago Police Department crime data. Chicago's deadliest year remains 1970 when there were 974 homicides.
https://abcnews.go.com/US/12-major-us-cities-top-annual-homicide-records/story?id=81466453
Chicago broke that record by the end of 2021
@capacrapa saidsuzi thinks she scored a point here but Chicago is an example, it doesn't have to be the worst.
@Suzianne
What are the "whitebread" cities above Chicago on your list?
If I said "blackbread" you would snitch on me like a little rat.
News for suzi: Chicago is an 'example'.
@shavixmir saidFacts?
Oh, the right-wing Kunt for brains don't like facts, do they.
Look at them squirm... little fukk head snowflakes.
Her list is "averages per 100k people"
Averages are not facts.
That's just the leftists way to avoid the truth.
@capacrapa saidNo. You can’t directly compare a city the size of Chicago to Wakefield Arkansas where 3 people and a pig live.
Facts?
Her list is "averages per 100k people"
Averages are not facts.
That's just the leftists way to avoid the truth.
So, you use % of population to get a rough comparison.
@capacrapa saidUnderstanding statistics for the beginner:
Facts?
Her list is "averages per 100k people"
Averages are not facts.
That's just the leftists way to avoid the truth.
A rate is a way to compare samples of different sizes. So not two of the cities have the same number of residents. A way to compare is to take the number of murders and the number of residents and make a quotient. Now you have murders per 100'000 population. regardless of the size of the city.
@ponderable said"How to Lie with Statistics" Darrell Huff.
Understanding statistics for the beginner:
A rate is a way to compare samples of different sizes. So not two of the cities have the same number of residents. A way to compare is to take the number of murders and the number of residents and make a quotient. Now you have murders per 100'000 population. regardless of the size of the city.
Chicago is an example, it doesn't have to be the worst example to still count as an example.
@wajoma saidWell I replied to a pots where the poster seemed not to have understood that a "rate" is a fact (even if of second order).
"How to Lie with Statistics" Darrell Huff.
Chicago is an example, it doesn't have to be the worst example to still count as an example.
Chigaco is a city with a very high (in Germany I would say astronomical) murder rate. (fact)
It is not the city with the highest rate (also fact).
Rates are a useful tool to compare numbers (also a fact).
So we have no beef . Do we?
@shavixmir saidYes and No shag doody. If there were a shooting in your 'example' town of 3 citizens and one person died '% of population' would not be very helpful. We understand what you're trying to say but you've fumbled it retardedly badly.
No. You can’t directly compare a city the size of Chicago to Wakefield Arkansas where 3 people and a pig live.
So, you use % of population to get a rough comparison.
@ponderable saidNo beef.
Well I replied to a pots where the poster seemed not to have understood that a "rate" is a fact (even if of second order).
Chigaco is a city with a very high (in Germany I would say astronomical) murder rate. (fact)
It is not the city with the highest rate (also fact).
Rates are a useful tool to compare numbers (also a fact).
So we have no beef . Do we?
The only one with a beef here is the one that has nothing but 'Kunt' and 'fukk head' in his repertoire of arguments.
@wajoma saidDid I rattle a 💩-bucket?
Yes and No shag doody. If there were a shooting in your 'example' town of 3 citizens and one person died '% of population' would not be very helpful. We understand what you're trying to say but you've fumbled it retardedly badly.
No. So shut up and fukk off. Nobody wants to hear what you’ve got to say.