- Joined
- 05 Nov 06
- Moves
- 147487
A good read...
"People who use one of these as a primary news source might consider switching to another source, one that is not obsessed with suppressing news of the President’s many achievements while relentlessly attacking his mistakes, both real and imagined. The attempt to cause the President political death by a thousand slurs is not fair to him and even less so to the general public.
Switching news sources may be difficult, especially for those who have used the same one for years, in some cases the same one their parents and grandparents used. Thus, they might well feel a strong sense of loyalty to the source. Nevertheless, it is important to ask what kind of loyalty that news source has shown them..
It is hardly an act of loyalty or respect of its audience for a news organization to underreport or suppress information necessary to make informed judgments. Moreover, to do so deliberately is a violation of its journalistic purpose."
https://mind-at-work.com/2515-2/
One of his many achievements...
Making me piss my pants laughing every second day, that’s about the sum of his achievements.
You do know that article is written dor Trump supporters, to make them feel better about their stupidity?
Most normal folk have 2 or 3 sources they get news from. Usually one of them will be a source which comes from an opposite angle.
Most normal folk fact-check stories on a regular basis.
Most normal people will have the BBC as one of their sources for non-British news.
- Joined
- 05 Nov 06
- Moves
- 147487
Originally posted by @shavixmirYou never disputed one claim...hmmm
One of his many achievements...
Making me piss my pants laughing every second day, that’s about the sum of his achievements.
You do know that article is written dor Trump supporters, to make them feel better about their stupidity?
Most normal folk have 2 or 3 sources they get news from. Usually one of them will be a source which comes from an opp ...[text shortened]... lar basis.
Most normal people will have the BBC as one of their sources for non-British news.
Originally posted by @mott-the-hoopleListen, just because the discovered e-mails showed CNN giving Hillary the debate questions before the debate in no way meant that Trump had to call them out on it and start a war with them.
A good read...
"People who use one of these as a primary news source might consider switching to another source, one that is not obsessed with suppressing news of the President’s many achievements while relentlessly attacking his mistakes, both real and imagined. The attempt to cause the President political death by a thousand slurs is not fair t ...[text shortened]... eliberately is a violation of its journalistic purpose."
https://mind-at-work.com/2515-2/
He should have done what all GOP candidates have done in the past and just pretend to ignore the 800 pound gorilla in the room.
Dims will just bide their time waiting for Oprah to save them and start targeting conservative with the IRS again, like the good old days.
Originally posted by @mott-the-hoopleI'd suggest reputable news sources from around the
"People who use one of these as a primary news source might ...
world which have no interest in Republican/Democrat spats.
I'd suggest reading the opinions of major
political figures from around the world.
I'd suggest looking at the opinions of international
entrepreneurs, scientists, social commentators etc.
Broaden your outlook.
- Joined
- 05 Nov 06
- Moves
- 147487
Originally posted by @wolfgang59only one with a 100 % accuracy rate. Wikileaks
I'd suggest reputable news sources from around the
world which have no interest in Republican/Democrat spats.
I'd suggest reading the opinions of major
political figures from around the world.
I'd suggest looking at the opinions of international
entrepreneurs, scientists, social commentators etc.
Broaden your outlook.
- Joined
- 14 Mar 15
- Moves
- 29602
Originally posted by @mott-the-hoopleHang on, just let me find my violin.
A good read...
"People who use one of these as a primary news source might consider switching to another source, one that is not obsessed with suppressing news of the President’s many achievements while relentlessly attacking his mistakes, both real and imagined. The attempt to cause the President political death by a thousand slurs is not fair t ...[text shortened]... eliberately is a violation of its journalistic purpose."
https://mind-at-work.com/2515-2/
Originally posted by @mott-the-hoopleDon't you mean "death by a thousand facts"?
A good read...
"People who use one of these as a primary news source might consider switching to another source, one that is not obsessed with suppressing news of the President’s many achievements while relentlessly attacking his mistakes, both real and imagined. The attempt to cause the President political death by a thousand slurs is not fair t ...[text shortened]... eliberately is a violation of its journalistic purpose."
https://mind-at-work.com/2515-2/
Originally posted by @mott-the-hooplePlease don't make me vomit.
only one with a 100 % accuracy rate. Wikileaks
Wikileaks presented Russian-doctored emails as fact. This is more than enough to diminish their credibility to zero.
Originally posted by @mott-the-hoopleThe attempt to cause the President political death by a thousand slurs is not fair to him and even less so to the general public.
A good read...
"People who use one of these as a primary news source might consider switching to another source, one that is not obsessed with suppressing news of the President’s many achievements while relentlessly attacking his mistakes, both real and imagined. The attempt to cause the President political death by a thousand slurs is not fair t ...[text shortened]... eliberately is a violation of its journalistic purpose."
https://mind-at-work.com/2515-2/
Oh yes, and "The Donald" has been so very polite and respectful to his political opponents and those in the media that point out his lies! If your golden boy can't take the heat, maybe he should go back to Dumph tower and bake cookies. 🙄🙄🙄
Originally posted by @mott-the-hoopleYour relationship with the facts is tenuous, at best.
no I don't...you wouldn't understand if I did say facts!
Originally posted by @mott-the-hooplenobody bothers, you're a joke
You never disputed one claim...hmmm