Go back
Democracy is just another form of mob rule

Democracy is just another form of mob rule

Debates

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down
-2

And given all the time, energy, and money tossed at "democratic" elections, wouldn't it be more efficient and cost-effective to just let some wannabe autocrat take charge and do as he will?

2 edits
Vote Up
2
Vote Down
-1

@Arkturos said
And given all the time, energy, and money tossed at "democratic" elections, wouldn't it be more efficient and cost-effective to just let some wannabe autocrat take charge and do as he will?
Tyranny is always best countered by the People, regardless of cost.

Any oppressed people, fighting for independence, would fight until the last person.
It's only cowards and bean-counters who would abdicate that responsibility.

Only cowards die on their knees.

Vote Up
1
Vote Down
-3

@Arkturos said
And given all the time, energy, and money tossed at "democratic" elections, wouldn't it be more efficient and cost-effective to just let some wannabe autocrat take charge and do as he will?
why are libs so ignorant of the US system? we are not a democracy

Vote Up
2
Vote Down
-1

@Mott-The-Hoople said
why are libs so ignorant of the US system? we are not a democracy
The point you are missing, troglodyte, is that a constitutional federal republic IS a democracy.

How have you been so ignorant of your own country for this many years?

Vote Up
1
Vote Down
-1

Tip for the day: Next time you hear the words "mob rule", feel free to ignore everything else they have to say.

Vote Up
3
Vote Down

@Arkturos said
And given all the time, energy, and money tossed at "democratic" elections, wouldn't it be more efficient and cost-effective to just let some wannabe autocrat take charge and do as he will?
You mean like Trump 47. We can track the outcome of your question in real time at the moment. The question is do you like what you see so far?

Vote Up
2
Vote Down

@Arkturos said
And given all the time, energy, and money tossed at "democratic" elections, wouldn't it be more efficient and cost-effective to just let some wannabe autocrat take charge and do as he will?
Mob rule, you mean, like on January 6th?

Vote Up
1
Vote Down

@Arkturos said
And given all the time, energy, and money tossed at "democratic" elections, wouldn't it be more efficient and cost-effective to just let some wannabe autocrat take charge and do as he will?
Certainly not when it's a Kakistocracy.

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.