@no1marauder saidYou are such a liar.
I believe I have before on this Forum (they've been doing so for years) but if you missed it:
Turkey shouldn't have troops in Syria.
You have never said that until now.
@no1marauder saidYou haven't studied the any election sufficiently to know whether it was fair or not. That is the problem. Syria held elections. You have no idea which elections are fair and which are not. You let allegations determine who you believe to be illegitimate leaders.
So your answer to my question is "no".
I haven't studied the last election sufficiently to know whether it was fair or not; my point was that this administration for purposes of oil and gas leases considers this regime "illegitimate" while for the purposes of considering whether Venezuelans who fled the regime should be allowed TPS, it considers it to have made substan ...[text shortened]... largely alleviating any humanitarian concerns. These positions are in obvious conflict with other.
@no1marauder saidWhat the heck are "disaggregated results" and what is the relevance in regards to the election?
The Carter Center did declare last July that "The electoral authority’s failure to announce disaggregated results by polling station constitutes a serious breach of electoral principles,” the Carter Center said. The group, which had a technical mission of 17 experts spread out in four cities across Venezuela, added that the election did not meet international standards an ...[text shortened]... icle/venezuela-presidential-election-maduro-machado-edmundo-results-3ec88b273cabfee8e5696ff67d24186d
Carter has a history of reversing himself without credible explanations. Mail in voting is a good example. He was against them and then he was for them. Carter was not a consistent creature. He is contradictory in his positions. Kind of like you are.
https://thefulcrum.us/electoral-reforms/jimmy-carter-vote-by-mail