Originally posted by AThousandYoungSo what you are saying is that Constantine was a poor leader. How is it then that Christianity should then be blamed?
Constantine established a monarchy system, in which leaders were chosen based on who Daddy is instead of merit. This gave a clear rule for succession, but this method leads to poor leaders.
Also, I have heard it been said that Constantine did not convert until his death bed. If so, he was not a "Christian" during any of this.
Originally posted by shavixmirI blame the basic idea behind religion, politics, military and capitalism for
I don't know these cities, but I'm sure as hell willing to blame the Christians...
every non-natural sorrow in the world. For turning us all against each other
and for poisoning our minds with senseless paranoia.
Originally posted by stockenI'm interested, not just for the sake of an argument, but what exactly do you consider that 'basic idea' to be.
I blame the basic idea behind religion, politics, military and capitalism for
every non-natural sorrow in the world. For turning us all against each other
and for poisoning our minds with senseless paranoia.
Originally posted by whodeyHis mistakes were the direct result of his Christianity e.g. intolerance and putting people in power based not on merit but on religion.
So what you are saying is that Constantine was a poor leader. How is it then that Christianity should then be blamed?
Also, I have heard it been said that Constantine did not convert until his death bed. If so, he was not a "Christian" during any of this.
Originally posted by ivanhoeyou got some readin' to do.
I propose two theories. One to suit the rabiate anti-Christian (more or less) leftist wing and one to suit the rabiate (more or less) rightist anti-Islam wing.
Of course the first theory claims that Christianity caused the downfall of Rome and the second claims that Islam caused the downfall of the Roman Empire when Constantinople fell in the fifteenth ce
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Decline_of_the_Roman_Empire
Please continue ........
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edward_Gibbon
"By 1751, Gibbon's reading was already voracious and certainly pointed toward his future pursuits: Laurence Echard's Roman History (1713), William Howel(l)'s An Institution of General History (1680–85), and several of the 65 volumes of the acclaimed Universal History from the Earliest Account of Time (1747–1768).[4]
"