Go back
Did Christianity destroy Rome?

Did Christianity destroy Rome?

Debates

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by AThousandYoung
I abandoned that premise on the first page.
That sounds so sad :'(

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by AThousandYoung
Rome grew to great power as polytheists, with special reverence for Jupiter and Mars. They took over Europe and North Africa. Then they adopted Christianity and it all fell apart.

Discuss.
The Goths sacked Rome, didn't they?

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by shavixmir
The Goths sacked Rome, didn't they?
Odoacer was actually an Aryan Christian, so perhaps Rome was sacked by (heretical) Christians.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Bosse de Nage
Odoacer was actually an Aryan Christian, so perhaps Rome was sacked by (heretical) Christians.
Bastard Christians. They're the fault of everything!

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by shavixmir
Bastard Christians. They're the fault of everything!
:'(

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by AThousandYoung
Constantine established a monarchy system, in which leaders were chosen based on who Daddy is instead of merit. This gave a clear rule for succession, but this method leads to poor leaders.
So what you are saying is that Constantine was a poor leader. How is it then that Christianity should then be blamed?

Also, I have heard it been said that Constantine did not convert until his death bed. If so, he was not a "Christian" during any of this.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by shavixmir
Bastard Christians. They're the fault of everything!
Are they responsible for Prada, Gucchi and similar abominations?

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Bosse de Nage
Are they responsible for Prada, Gucchi and similar abominations?
I don't know these cities, but I'm sure as hell willing to blame the Christians...

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by shavixmir
I don't know these cities, but I'm sure as hell willing to blame the Christians...
I blame the basic idea behind religion, politics, military and capitalism for
every non-natural sorrow in the world. For turning us all against each other
and for poisoning our minds with senseless paranoia.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by stocken
I blame the basic idea behind religion, politics, military and capitalism for
every non-natural sorrow in the world. For turning us all against each other
and for poisoning our minds with senseless paranoia.
I'm interested, not just for the sake of an argument, but what exactly do you consider that 'basic idea' to be.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by shavixmir
I don't know these cities, but I'm sure as hell willing to blame the Christians...
Have you turned muzzie?

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by shavixmir
The Goths sacked Rome, didn't they?
After Constantine...

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by whodey
So what you are saying is that Constantine was a poor leader. How is it then that Christianity should then be blamed?

Also, I have heard it been said that Constantine did not convert until his death bed. If so, he was not a "Christian" during any of this.
His mistakes were the direct result of his Christianity e.g. intolerance and putting people in power based not on merit but on religion.

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by ivanhoe
I propose two theories. One to suit the rabiate anti-Christian (more or less) leftist wing and one to suit the rabiate (more or less) rightist anti-Islam wing.

Of course the first theory claims that Christianity caused the downfall of Rome and the second claims that Islam caused the downfall of the Roman Empire when Constantinople fell in the fifteenth ce


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Decline_of_the_Roman_Empire


Please continue ........
you got some readin' to do.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edward_Gibbon

"By 1751, Gibbon's reading was already voracious and certainly pointed toward his future pursuits: Laurence Echard's Roman History (1713), William Howel(l)'s An Institution of General History (1680–85), and several of the 65 volumes of the acclaimed Universal History from the Earliest Account of Time (1747–1768).[4]
"

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by AThousandYoung
Constantine established a monarchy system, in which leaders were chosen based on who Daddy is instead of merit. This gave a clear rule for succession, but this method leads to poor leaders.
nero's ascension was based on merit?