As the facts of the case are clearly proven as to what Hunter did, breaking a law that carries a penalty, why did the jury not make a decision on the facts, which is their job, and come out inside of an hour, wigh a guilty verdict??.
The evidence, the legal issue, is quite compelling. So if they languish with this, we will witness double standard, etc as they find, in the hometown of the defendant, an acquittal.
Why is it a double standard? Because of the hometown jury who loves him, while in NYC, which hates Trump, found him guilty.
Killer stuff for you conflicted liberals. Hunter is clearly guilty, but since they are still talking, there will an acquittal or hung jury.
Can't you hear them...."Guilty is not on the table"!
@AverageJoe1 saidYou talk backwards What is the different standard?
As the facts of the case are clearly proven as to what Hunter did, breaking a law that carries a penalty, why did the jury not make a decision on the facts, which is their job, and come out inside of an hour, wigh a guilty verdict??.
The evidence, the legal issue, is quite compelling. So if they languish with this, we will witness double standard, etc as they find, in ...[text shortened]... ing, there will an acquittal or hung jury.
Can't you hear them...."Guilty is not on the table"!
Do you think what Hunter did should be illegal?
@AverageJoe1
Yes, you're quite right, there is clearly a double standard in Amerikan justice. If any other defendant had insulted and impugned a judge, intimidated witnesses, bullied prosecutors, repeatedly violated gag orders, and claimed the whole thing should be dismissed so he could run for county dog-catcher, he'd have been spending the night in the pokey and appearing unshaven and humbled in court the next day. But no, The Donald is pampered like no other defendant, unequal before the law. Hunter should be so lucky.
@wildgrass saidIt is not what I think, it is the law that it is illegal. You can hardly ask someone a subjective question, like 'do i think' taxpayers should pay off the loans of another taxpayer. Of course I do not think that.
You talk backwards What is the different standard?
Do you think what Hunter did should be illegal?
Anyway, yes, I think it should be illegal for Hunter to get away with what people are otherwise jailed for, to put it bluntly. You messin' w me?
Diff standards are the ways the two men were treated in their trials. Such as the gag order.....why not Hunter? Trump had one. Curious, huh?
- Joined
- 05 Nov 06
- Moves
- 145378
@AverageJoe1 saidif hunter was black he would already be behind bars
It is not what I think, it is the law that it is illegal. You can hardly ask someone a subjective question, like 'do i think' taxpayers should pay off the loans of another taxpayer. Of course I do not think that.
Anyway, yes, I think it should be illegal for Hunter to get away with what people are otherwise jailed for, to put it bluntly. You messin' w me?
Diff ...[text shortened]... ere treated in their trials. Such as the gag order.....why not Hunter? Trump had one. Curious, huh?