Originally posted by whodey http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-08-10/democratic-strategist-calls-assassination-julian-assange
I guess those e-mails are getting to Dims. I heard today that e-mails were released that showed illegal activity with Clinton Foundation.
I guess when Dims do this, it is OK, but God forbid Trump implies something, even though he later denied implying it.
Confusing for you lot, but since Clinton is a well established NeoCon and warmonger, you will have to stop thinking of her as progressive and stop asking progressive people to justify her friends and her allies. She never was and never will be progressive. She is a reactionary.
Originally posted by finnegan Confusing for you lot, but since Clinton is a well established NeoCon and warmonger, you will have to stop thinking of her as progressive and stop asking progressive people to justify her friends and her allies. She never was and never will be progressive. She is a reactionary.
But she identifies as a Progressive.
How does one pass the litmus test for being a Progressive?
Originally posted by whodey I guess when Dims do this, it is OK, but God forbid Trump implies something, even though he later denied implying it.
What makes you think it is OK for a Dim to suggest an illegal assassination? It isn't OK.
Is that particular Dim a presidential candidate?
Did that particular Dim suggest assassinating a sitting president of the US, or a foreigner guilty of espionage against the US?
Hilarious how you actually want it known that Trump not only implied something but then denied having done so. Did the Dim also deny having done so, or does the Dim come out looking better on that score too?
Originally posted by twhitehead What makes you think it is OK for a Dim to suggest an illegal assassination? It isn't OK.
Is that particular Dim a presidential candidate?
Did that particular Dim suggest assassinating a sitting president of the US, or a foreigner guilty of espionage against the US?
Hilarious how you actually want it known that Trump not only implied something but then ...[text shortened]... Did the Dim also deny having done so, or does the Dim come out looking better on that score too?
Originally posted by finnegan Confusing for you lot, but since Clinton is a well established NeoCon and warmonger, you will have to stop thinking of her as progressive and stop asking progressive people to justify her friends and her allies. She never was and never will be progressive. She is a reactionary.
Originally posted by twhitehead When will someone tell Trump that speeches are recorded?
Get real. He was referring to lobbyists working for the NRA. The day before Clinton was complaining about those same lobbyists who are working to keep the 2nd amendment in place... this is what Trump was referring to.
You're looking for a conspiracy that doesn't exist. You guys think Freaky is off the rails with his conspiracy theories, and meanwhile liberals are concocting new ones almost every day.
Originally posted by whodey http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-08-10/democratic-strategist-calls-assassination-julian-assange
I guess those e-mails are getting to Dims. I heard today that e-mails were released that showed illegal activity with Clinton Foundation.
I guess when Dims do this, it is OK, but God forbid Trump implies something, even though he later denied implying it.
Bob Beckel hasn't been a "Democratic strategist" since 2002. He worked for Fox for 5 years, wrote columns for USA Today and is currently with CNN. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bob_Beckel
And it seems that comment was made over 6 years ago, so it's a bit stale to say the least. And obviously unrelated to any recent e-mails.
Dim suggests assassinating Julian Assange
11 Aug '16 01:32
Back to Top