Debates Forum

Debates Forum

  1. Joined
    02 Jan '06
    Moves
    10087
    15 Feb '16 19:401 edit
    http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2016/02/dems_in_senate_passed_a_resolution_in1960_against_election_year_supreme_court_appointments.html

    Read it and weep, Democrats. The shoe is on the other foot. David Bernstein at the Washington Post’s Volokh Conspiracy blog:


    Thanks to a VC commenter, I discovered that in August 1960, the Democrat-controlled Senate passed a resolution, S.RES. 334, “Expressing the sense of the Senate that the president should not make recess appointments to the Supreme Court, except to prevent or end a breakdown in the administration of the Court’s business.” Each of President Eisenhower’s SCOTUS appointments had initially been a recess appointment who was later confirmed by the Senate, and the Democrats were apparently concerned that Ike would try to fill any last-minute vacancy that might arise with a recess appointment.

    The GOP opposed this, of course. Hypocrisy goes two ways. But the majority won.

    As it should this time.
  2. Joined
    29 Dec '08
    Moves
    6788
    15 Feb '16 19:46
    Originally posted by whodey
    http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2016/02/dems_in_senate_passed_a_resolution_in1960_against_election_year_supreme_court_appointments.html

    Read it and weep, Democrats. The shoe is on the other foot. David Bernstein at the Washington Post’s Volokh Conspiracy blog:


    Thanks to a VC commenter, I discovered that in August 1960, the Democrat-controlled Sen ...[text shortened]... posed this, of course. Hypocrisy goes two ways. But the majority won.

    As it should this time.
    https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/86-1960/s415

    quote:

    Although the vote occurred in an election year, there is no indication that this vote was about election year appointments specifically. Eisenhower had used the recess appointment power to make previous appointments to the Supreme Court, and Democrats objected to further use of the recess appointment power. No President has used the recess appointment power to appoint a justice of the Supreme Court since then
  3. Subscriberno1marauder
    Humble and Kind
    In the Gazette
    Joined
    22 Jun '04
    Moves
    39965
    15 Feb '16 19:46
    Originally posted by whodey
    http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2016/02/dems_in_senate_passed_a_resolution_in1960_against_election_year_supreme_court_appointments.html

    Read it and weep, Democrats. The shoe is on the other foot. David Bernstein at the Washington Post’s Volokh Conspiracy blog:


    Thanks to a VC commenter, I discovered that in August 1960, the Democrat-controlled Sen ...[text shortened]... posed this, of course. Hypocrisy goes two ways. But the majority won.

    As it should this time.
    Apples and oranges.

    No one has proposed that Obama fill this SCOTUS vacancy with a recess appointment.
  4. Joined
    04 Feb '05
    Moves
    29132
    15 Feb '16 19:52
    Originally posted by whodey
    http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2016/02/dems_in_senate_passed_a_resolution_in1960_against_election_year_supreme_court_appointments.html

    Read it and weep, Democrats. The shoe is on the other foot. David Bernstein at the Washington Post’s Volokh Conspiracy blog:


    Thanks to a VC commenter, I discovered that in August 1960, the Democrat-controlled Sen ...[text shortened]... posed this, of course. Hypocrisy goes two ways. But the majority won.

    As it should this time.
    that's for the past few months

    obama has another 9 months in office

    how about you chill
  5. The Catbird's Seat
    Joined
    21 Oct '06
    Moves
    2598
    15 Feb '16 20:52
    Originally posted by Zahlanzi
    that's for the past few months

    obama has another 9 months in office

    how about you chill
    How about you use capitalization and punctuation?
  6. SubscriberAThousandYoung
    iEn guardia, Ingles!
    tinyurl.com/y43jqfyd
    Joined
    23 Aug '04
    Moves
    24791
    15 Feb '16 20:56
    Originally posted by normbenign
    How about you use capitalization and punctuation?
    Capital letters are the difference between helping your Uncle Jack off a horse and helping your uncle jack off a horse.
  7. Joined
    04 Feb '05
    Moves
    29132
    15 Feb '16 23:30
    Originally posted by normbenign
    How about you use capitalization and punctuation?
    no
  8. The Catbird's Seat
    Joined
    21 Oct '06
    Moves
    2598
    16 Feb '16 00:00
    Originally posted by AThousandYoung
    Capital letters are the difference between helping your Uncle Jack off a horse and helping your uncle jack off a horse.
    Smile. 😀
  9. The Catbird's Seat
    Joined
    21 Oct '06
    Moves
    2598
    16 Feb '16 00:01
    Originally posted by Zahlanzi
    no
    Not interested in being better understood? Punctuation and capitalization do have real purpose, not just some arbitrary rules making typing more difficult for you.
  10. Joined
    04 Feb '05
    Moves
    29132
    16 Feb '16 00:30
    Originally posted by normbenign
    Not interested in being better understood? Punctuation and capitalization do have real purpose, not just some arbitrary rules making typing more difficult for you.
    i use punctuation. i don't use capital letters just so you can have something to whine about when you run out of ideas. which is often.


    if you have trouble comprehending my posts, ask and i shall explain them again. maybe with pictures. smaller words. would that be all, or will insist on being a sad grammar nazi some more?
Back to Top