24 Nov 10
Originally posted by stokerDude, this is an old wifes tale.
remember guys get it made final, as a woman returned to court after 10 years divorced [where she was the guilty party] and got £2,000,000 plus £2000 per week after her ex won the lottery, just because at the time it was not made final
24 Nov 10
1 edit
Originally posted by John W BoothThere has been a case in the news of a guy winning 90million Euro who gave his wife 3 mill and upped the maintenance payments. But apparently he initiated the conversation about the money to the ex.
Dude, this is an old wifes tale.
[edit] read all about it
http://www.heraldsun.com.au/news/world/million-euromillions-lotto-jackpot-winner-nigel-page-forced-to-give-share-to-ex-wife/story-e6frf7lf-1225959195618
24 Nov 10
Originally posted by kmax87Yeah... I think giving someone 3 million when you've just won 90 million is a bloody disgrace.
There has been a case in the news of a guy winning 90million Euro who gave his wife 3 mill and upped the maintenance payments. But apparently he initiated the conversation about the money to the ex.
[edit] read all about it
http://www.heraldsun.com.au/news/world/million-euromillions-lotto-jackpot-winner-nigel-page-forced-to-give-share-to-ex-wife/story-e6frf7lf-1225959195618
24 Nov 10
Originally posted by shavixmir😵
Yeah... I think giving someone 3 million when you've just won 90 million is a bloody disgrace.
At the end of the day people who were married loved eachother once (or I should hope so anyway) and so what's wrong with showing that in money? Many women give up their career when they get married and support the family so it's right that the money should be shared equally. And what's money anyway? At the end of days it'll be ash.
25 Nov 10
Originally posted by shavixmirThe Herald Sun reports him as being particularly cut up about having to give her anything, though that's probably just their spin. At the end of the day he may not have had much to give if he had just started his own hedge fund...
Yeah... I think giving someone 3 million when you've just won 90 million is a bloody disgrace.
26 Nov 10
Originally posted by yo its meno many women marry for money. that is there career. but money shared equally at time of divorce is not the question. if you married say for 10 years then decided for your own reasons to divorce and after another 10 years you say get a better job, win a lot of money, inherit a lot from a family member are you saying some of that should go to your former partner?
😵
At the end of the day people who were married loved eachother once (or I should hope so anyway) and so what's wrong with showing that in money? Many women give up their career when they get married and support the family so it's right that the money should be shared equally. And what's money anyway? At the end of days it'll be ash.
26 Nov 10
Originally posted by stokerWell if it's their career- then good luck to them. There's no way I'd be fooled into such an arrangment. I'm sure they'll get what they deserve- whatever that maybe 😉
no many women marry for money. that is there career. but money shared equally at time of divorce is not the question. if you married say for 10 years then decided for your own reasons to divorce and after another 10 years you say get a better job, win a lot of money, inherit a lot from a family member are you saying some of that should go to your former partner?
Yes if I loved someone and after 10years we seperated and long after that I got lucky with the greens; I don't see a problem with sharing it with people I love, weather they're still in my life or not.
If you won the lottery wouldn't you share it with relitives that you haven't see for donkey's years?- simply becasue you love them.