05 Jan '10 08:19>
Originally posted by USArmyParatrooperWell, we are getting into "how to fix the tax code" now. How to do that is NOT just jack up rates on the rich.
When one person owns so much of the wealth, lots of money that could be circulating in commerce sits in a bank somewhere. A person making $50,000 per year is likely to spend the vast majority of his earnings, thus, keeping the economy going and benefiting everyone (including the rich). A person making $50,000,000 per year is likely to live a lavish ...[text shortened]... e class. What would that do to our economy and how would it affect the rich who got a tax cut?
Briefly, you have to treat people and businesses the same -- both have income, both have necessary expenses. So the goal is -- tax the part of income that is above necessary expenses. Also, income is income -- doesn't matter earned or unearned. Who cares?
So you put in place one simple system where people look at what the "got" and deduct what they "had to spend" to maintain themselves -- and you flat tax the rest. Same system applies almost universally, so the maintenance and compliance costs go way down.
I also like the negative income tax as a way of providing for the truly poor and indigent.