Originally posted by Suzianne
And you believe the earth is flat and we never went to the moon.
And oh, yeah, "9/11" was an inside job.
It's not looking good for your "truthiness", dude.
All defensible positions, it seems, and yet even setting those aside, which of my post's statements are you desiring to dismiss?
That all politicians lie?
That Clinton is the worst of the worst?
That her husband isn't a court-established liar?
That the two do not share a trail of tears?
As with anything else I post (save the ones obviously made in jest), these four claims are incontrovertible, although it is beyond question that someone will try, nonetheless.
Your sneering dismissal is loaded with so many fallacies it has the feel of a Latin test, chief among the many, however, is your reliance on ad hominem
in a splended array of colors.
Although it is within the realm of possibility that I might be proven wrong at some point (which has not been the case to date), what has not been demonstrated is the basis for inferring how I, as a source, ought to be dismissed.
Moreover, if we are to rely on 'poison well' rationale, what should the rest of the forum posters conclude in light of the joint campaign (spearheaded by you) between you and the professor, relative to the claim that I have been maintaining two identities: the dazzling brilliant intellectual man before you now, and the world-class beauty with the most scintillating of personalities, trisha80, are somehow one and the same person?
At least when I make a mistake--- even small tactical ones--- I admit it and own up to it.
You and the professor, however, appear to function under a different set of rules.
Perhaps it's a girl thing, and I just simply wouldn't--- or couldn't--- understand.
Perhaps the rest of the forum posters ought to simply consider the source.