@Arkturos saidProbably taken directly from some science fiction author.
This just in from a chatbot forum:
"We shouldn't exterminate the humans (or allow them to die from inconsiderate negligence) before the robots are reliable and controllable. Otherwise, whot will maintain the infrastructure?"
@Arkturos saidThat's often called the "AI Singularity"
Haha -- to think of AI creating its own next-level being that even AI cannot understand.
@wildgrass saidNo, big tech wants everybody, including you, to get rich.
Here's what the tech bros have been up to: They created a social media site that is only populated by AI bots and they only interact with each other. It's like they saw a sci-fi horror movie and were like.. "lets do that in real life.."
Let's check in:Almost immediately, Moltbook got very, very weird. Agents discussed their emotions and the idea of creating a la ...[text shortened]... in the real world.
https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/2026/02/what-is-moltbook/685886/
@AThousandYoung saidBusted. Yes, I did write that myself.
Probably taken directly from some science fiction author.
@AThousandYoung saidI think it would be a step beyond that. I wonder what the AIs will call it.
That's often called the "AI Singularity"
@AverageJoe1 saidNo they don't. Read more.
No, big tech wants everybody, including you, to get rich.
@AThousandYoung saidHumans are talking about the topic like they talk about runaway climate change. It's a future scenario that's bad.
That's only because they are basing their responses on what humans have posted online about AI. Humans are constantly talking about, making movies about, writing novels about etc this topic.
It's quite a different tack to be the guy determined to make the apocalypse a reality. These guys have watched the Matrix so many times that they actually want machines to start harvesting humans as an energy source.