Does Government/USAID have a duty to supply jobs?

@no1marauder said
Miranda Devine, whoever that is, never read the Social Security website:

"Effective September 2015, the Social Security Administration (SSA) implemented an automated process in which the Regular Transcript Attainment and Selection Pass (RETAP) application selects records for which the Title II beneficiary is:
•
Age 115 or older;
•
In any current continuous s ...[text shortened]... GreF#selection-223.0-303.169

Do dimwits like Ms. Levine ever retract their ignorant, lazy claims?

@Cliff-Mashburn said
Interesting notion.
What makes you think that?

This term [property] in its particular application means "that dominion which one man claims and exercises over the external things of the world, in exclusion of every other individual." In its larger and juster meaning, it embraces every thing to which a man may attach a value and have a right; and which leaves to every one else the like advantage...

...That is not a just government, nor is property secure under it, where...monopolies deny to part of its citizens that free use of their faculties, and free choice of their occupations, which not only constitute their property in the general sense of the word; but are the means of acquiring property strictly so called."

James Madison
March 29, 1792
http://www.vindicatingthefounders.com/library/index.asp?document=57

Nor was this appropriation of any parcel of land, by improving it, any prejudice to any other man, since there was still enough and as good left, and more than the yet unprovided could use. So that, in effect, there was never the less left for others because of his enclosure for himself. "

John Locke
http://libertyonline.hypermall.com/Locke/second/second-frame.html

@AThousandYoung said
What makes you think the government should use State violence to artificially prop up the wealth of a small minority of citizens against the interests of the majority?

@Suzianne said
Have you ever been a real, feeling human being?

@Cliff-Mashburn said
WTF are you talking about?
When TF did I say anything TF like that?
You really are warped.

@AThousandYoung said
That’s what it means for police to do evictions. Without that threat of State violence the property would be worth far less.

@Cliff-Mashburn said
You really are warped.
So if you owned a house and rented it to some dead beats, you don't think law enforcement should be allowed to evict them>

@AThousandYoung said
As long as the government is using force to protect absentee landlords' property rights it has a responsibility to make sure people can afford to pay the rent.

@AThousandYoung said
When did I say that?

I said those “deadbeats” should be able to afford the rent. If the police are going to evict them then the government is taking sides against those without land - who are the majority (55% of the population).

@Cliff-Mashburn said
OMG YOU JUST SAID THAT IN YOUR PREVIOUS POSTS.
Are you high? Or just stupid?

If there were no government then vacant homes and homelessness could not both exist because the homeless would move into those vacant homes.

The only reason they don’t is because of government threats of force. The purpose of those threats is to maintain high property values for the absentee landowners.

Am I wrong?

@Cliff-Mashburn said
I've been married for 50 years and have great grandchildren.
I'm not a sour dried up lonely old tranny like you.
So yes, I am and have always been.

@Cliff-Mashburn said
I've been married for 50 years and have great grandchildren.
I'm not a sour dried up lonely old tranny like you.
So yes, I am and have always been.

@no1marauder said
I tried to find it in the Constitution where it says the President doesn't have to spend money that the Congress has already appropriated by law, but I can't seem to locate it. Could you help me out?

I mean he's supposed "to take care that laws are faithfully executed" like you said - that includes spending bills passed by Congress, doesn't it?