100d
If she is in a meeting on economics, the economists in there ....she will be sooo-towering above them at her end of the table....the economists will discuss things in a way that will be greek to her.
Digitable transformation?
Growth hacking?
Customer centric?
Blockchain?
Omni channel?
Data driven?
How will her parlance go, given the way she has a penchant for word salad to mix in with it all. They will be as confused as she is. She starts knowing nothing.
She has never run a business, had employees, used balance sheets or spread sheets etc....Nothing. Nothing. Are you mad?
@AverageJoe1 saidShe has never run a business, had employees, used balance sheets or spread sheets etc....Nothing. Nothing. Are you mad?
If she is in a meeting on economics, the economists in there ....she will be sooo-towering above them at her end of the table....the economists will discuss things in a way that will be greek to her.
Digitable transformation?
Growth hacking?
Customer centric?
Blockchain?
Omni channel?
Data driven?
How will her parlance go, given the way she has a penchant for w ...[text shortened]... business, had employees, used balance sheets or spread sheets etc....Nothing. Nothing. Are you mad?
Kamala Harris has prosecuted a number of complicated financial fraud cases, she (unlike The Donald) knows how to read income statements, balance sheets, and can decipher even the most complicated economic theories and journals.
The Donald on the other hand has gone bankrupt no less than 6 times, this despite inheriting millions from his rich daddy. In addition, the only truly profitable venture he had was his TV program The Apprentice. Your "sharp businessman" couldn't run a hotdog stand without going broke. The Trump organization would be more profitable if my dog ran it. Wake up Joe....your Messiah is a business idiot.
100d
@AverageJoe1 saidOh no another misguided post Joe.
If she is in a meeting on economics, the economists in there ....she will be sooo-towering above them at her end of the table....the economists will discuss things in a way that will be greek to her.
Digitable transformation?
Growth hacking?
Customer centric?
Blockchain?
Omni channel?
Data driven?
How will her parlance go, given the way she has a penchant for w ...[text shortened]... business, had employees, used balance sheets or spread sheets etc....Nothing. Nothing. Are you mad?
She has prosecuted very large financial crimes cases. Capitalism doesn't exist unless we play by a common set of rules.
100d
@wildgrass saidwrong thread? this about a mind for business, not a mind for criminal law. Please. Why so obtuse, so cute?
Oh no another misguided post Joe.
She has prosecuted very large financial crimes cases. Capitalism doesn't exist unless we play by a common set of rules.
Tariffs can be complicated
100d
@AverageJoe1 saidBusinessmen and women don't belong in the White House.
If she is in a meeting on economics, the economists in there ....she will be sooo-towering above them at her end of the table....the economists will discuss things in a way that will be greek to her.
Digitable transformation?
Growth hacking?
Customer centric?
Blockchain?
Omni channel?
Data driven?
How will her parlance go, given the way she has a penchant for w ...[text shortened]... business, had employees, used balance sheets or spread sheets etc....Nothing. Nothing. Are you mad?
She has actually worked for a living.
She's eminently more qualified.
@AverageJoe1 saidWhy do you keep regurgitating this stuff from your MAGA forums?
If she is in a meeting on economics, the economists in there ....she will be sooo-towering above them at her end of the table....the economists will discuss things in a way that will be greek to her.
Digitable transformation?
Growth hacking?
Customer centric?
Blockchain?
Omni channel?
Data driven?
How will her parlance go, given the way she has a penchant for w ...[text shortened]... business, had employees, used balance sheets or spread sheets etc....Nothing. Nothing. Are you mad?
As I’ve pointed out to you previously; she won’t be running a business, she’ll be leading the country.
Besides, those phrases you’ve mentioned aren’t exactly economics business business science terms?
99d
@Suzianne saidThe definition of 'work', esp when libs are involved, are many. Libs wrestle with the concept of '"makiing money in my sleep".
Businessmen and women don't belong in the White House.
She has actually worked for a living.
She's eminently more qualified.
If my factory is chuggin along, and I go to Italy and mess around and sleep for 3 weeks, , I will have a good bit of money wired into my Italian bank while I am there.
Am I working???
Y'all REALLY have to turn it up a notch. Oh Lord, there is another post from Sonhouse coming it............................
99d
@AverageJoe1 saidNope, that's not working, it is called exploitation.
The definition of 'work', esp when libs are involved, are many. Libs wrestle with the concept of '"makiing money in my sleep".
If my factory is chuggin along, and I go to Italy and mess around and sleep for 3 weeks, , I will have a good bit of money wired into my Italian bank while I am there.
Am I working???
Y'all REALLY have to turn it up a notch. Oh Lord, there is another post from Sonhouse coming it............................
99d
@divegeester saidMy point was to show she does not know the easy ones.
Why do you keep regurgitating this stuff from your MAGA forums?
As I’ve pointed out to you previously; she won’t be running a business, she’ll be leading the country.
Besides, those phrases you’ve mentioned aren’t exactly economics business business science terms?
Out of Obama, Biden, and Kamala, neither of them have ever been in the business world. Just think about it ….please understand that if a man has a lot of businesses, they are not all going to go perfect. Some may even bankrupt. So we might say that out of all of his businesses, 80% of them were successful. and, they were obviously successful. You People argue, no facts, with no facts.. There is nothing out there to fight about. It is a fact. He is a successful businessman. And I cannot believe that Suzanne said last week that we should not have a businessman as a president. Unbelievable the way you people don’t think..
99d
@AverageJoe1 saidYou witter on about “no facts” in a thread by you where you yourself present no facts just your usual regurgitated conjecture.
My point was to show she does not know the easy ones.
Out of Obama, Biden, and Kamala, neither of them have ever been in the business world. Just think about it ….please understand that if a man has a lot of businesses, they are not all going to go perfect. Some may even bankrupt. So we might say that out of all of his businesses, 80% of them were successful. and, th ...[text shortened]... that we should not have a businessman as a president. Unbelievable the way you people don’t think..
98d
@AverageJoe1 saidpoor pathetic little man with barely a high school education is worried an accomplished AG who served as VP of the U freakin S doesn't understand business terms. But is not worried that the orange idiot who bankrupted 4 (or was it 5) times might not be the brightest bulb in the business world.
If she is in a meeting on economics, the economists in there ....she will be sooo-towering above them at her end of the table....the economists will discuss things in a way that will be greek to her.
Digitable transformation?
Growth hacking?
Customer centric?
Blockchain?
Omni channel?
Data driven?
How will her parlance go, given the way she has a penchant for w ...[text shortened]... business, had employees, used balance sheets or spread sheets etc....Nothing. Nothing. Are you mad?
98d
@Zahlanzi saidSay it like it is…. all of his businesses were not successful, let’s say that he had an 80% successful business rate.
poor pathetic little man with barely a high school education is worried an accomplished AG who served as VP of the U freakin S doesn't understand business terms. But is not worried that the orange idiot who bankrupted 4 (or was it 5) times might not be the brightest bulb in the business world.
So, he was successful. You apparently don’t understand bankruptcy.
98d
@AverageJoe1
And you will go to your fuuking GRAVE not noticing that Trump is a crook and always was and always will be given the chance.
You dismiss felony charges because nobody was killed and I have no doubt you would dismiss any that DID involve dead people, for instance like the hundreds of thousands of death on his watch by his utter incompetence handling the Covid crisis, 'it will all be over by Easter', or ingest uv lights, kills covid in minutes.
And you dismiss or totally believe every POS spewing from his orange mouth.