Go back
Does one have a right to do evil ?

Does one have a right to do evil ?

Debates

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by ivanhoe
Reading the forums I can't help noticing that certain debaters hold the position that one has the right to do evil. One has a "right" to damage oneself and one has a right to damage others.

.... and all this in the name of human "autonomy" and human "freedom".

Do you agree with those debaters or do you hold a different position ?
As usual, your definition of evil differs vastly from the general concensus. You have also answered every question directed at you with a question, as usual. I am bored of your style of debate hoe, it's like having a conversation with one of those 1980s speech robots like 'Eliza', where if they didn't have a pre-programmed response to your sentence, they'd just repeat your question back at you.

One has a right to damage one's self with drugs and a right to damage others with words. Is this evil? No, welcome to life, perhaps you could get over it quietly?

2 edits
Vote Up
Vote Down

Having a right which could be exercised/exploited for evil purposes is probably best not described as "a right to do evil".

But your post does raise interesting questions about how we should conceive of "rights".

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by ivanhoe
LJ: "I don't think you know what you are talking about here."

I see.

LJ: "I think it is probably the case that people are advocating practices that you personally view as evil, but which they do not."

Hhhmm ....

LJ: " I doubt they are simultaneously holding the beliefs that one has the right to do X and that it is evil to do X ... "

You assume that people are rational beings .... that's very noble of you.
You directed comments at every sentence in my post except the one in which i asked you to please cite specific examples. I even said "please" in a polite and agreeable fashion. You see, hoe, you only look for the bad in people! What do you expect to find in that case?

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by ivanhoe
Is it ? I wonder what LJ thinks of this ? LJ ?
LJ still thinks you don't know what you are talking about here. Please and thank you.

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Starrman
You have also answered every question directed at you with a question, as usual. I am bored of your style of debate hoe, it's like having a conversation with one of those 1980s speech robots like 'Eliza', where if they didn't have a pre-programmed response to your sentence, they'd just repeat your question back at you.

One has a right to damage one's se ...[text shortened]... rs with words. Is this evil? No, welcome to life, perhaps you could get over it quietly?
Starrman .... one of my biggest fans ... how are you ?

Starrman: "As usual, your definition of evil differs vastly from the general concensus."

I reread this sentence many times. Its framing and meaning is mysterious in more than one way .......

Edit: I thought about it, but from your mouth this should be a compliment, but apparently it is not .... confusing and enigmatic, I must admit ...

Vote Up
Vote Down

Well, for the sake of argument I'll offer an example.

Let's say a close relative of mine has been raped and murdered on Monday. Does your freedom of speech include the right to make gratuitously offensive jokes about this when you meet with me on Tuesday?

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by dottewell
Having a right which could be exercised/exploited for evil purposes is probably best not described as "a right to do evil".

But your post does raise interesting questions about how we should conceive of "rights".
Dottewell: "But your post does raise interesting questions about how we should conceive of "rights"."

Thank you !

3 edits
Vote Up
Vote Down

And here is another example:

My body is such that my bone marrow is an exact match for two young children who are dying of a rare disease. I am aware of this. It has been arranged that they will receive a transplant from me on Tueday.

Does my right to autonomy include the right to kill myself by setting myself on fire (destroying my body completely) on Monday?

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by LemonJello
You directed comments at every sentence in my post except the one in which i asked you to please cite specific examples. I even said "please" in a polite and agreeable fashion. You see, hoe, you only look for the bad in people! What do you expect to find in that case?
If you read my posts in this thread you will understand why I didn't adress this specific question in your post. I allready gave the examples in other posts directed at other debaters.

The "right" to offend/insult/verbally abuse and the "right" to use drugs that are damaging to your psyche and body.


Do these examples count for you or do you want me to repeat them in a post specifically adressed to you ? You know I am here to serve ......

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by dottewell
And here is another example:

My body is such that my bone marrow is an exact match for two young children who are dying of a rare disease. I am aware of this. It has been arranged that they will receive a transplant from me on Tueday.

Does my right to autonomy include the right to kill myself by setting myself on fire (destroying my body completely) on Monday?
Not in my book.

By the way, why is it that you mention two children ?

... because this is not the end of the story, right ? 🙂

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by LemonJello
LJ still thinks you don't know what you are talking about here. Please and thank you.
LJ: "LJ still thinks you don't know what you are talking about here."

That's why I invited you to shine your undoubtedly clarifying light upon matters. Don't you feel like entering a debate about moral universalism versus moral relativism here ?

Don't you feel like entering a debate on how ethical truths are established or discovered ? By voting on issues ? Does one decide on moral issues by asking the majority ? Surely not .... but I don't know what I am talking about, so .....

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by ivanhoe
By the way, why is it that you mention two children ?

... because this is not the end of the story, right ? 🙂
Nothing that exciting, I'm afraid.

It was just to raise the question whether the number of lives I could save might be a relevant consideration.

I'm not saying I agree with you; I would still argue that I may have a right to do it. Whether it would be the correct thing to do is another matter. And it does leave the question: what does it mean to say I have a "right" to do it?

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by ivanhoe
Starrman .... one of my biggest fans ... how are you ?

Don't flatter yourself.

I reread this sentence many times. Its framing and meaning is mysterious in more than one way .......

How umm, wonderful... I guess that's just how I move, no, wait, that's god. Do you like mysteries ivanhoe?

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by dottewell
Well, for the sake of argument I'll offer an example.

Let's say a close relative of mine has been raped and murdered on Monday. Does your freedom of speech include the right to make gratuitously offensive jokes about this when you meet with me on Tuesday?
Not in my book.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Starrman
Originally posted by ivanhoe
[b]Starrman .... one of my biggest fans ... how are you ?


Don't flatter yourself.

I reread this sentence many times. Its framing and meaning is mysterious in more than one way .......

How umm, wonderful... I guess that's just how I move, no, wait, that's god. Do you like mysteries ivanhoe?[/b]
Starrman: " Do you like mysteries ivanhoe?"

Yes, I like people.