@sonhouse saidI was generalizing actually, people like Sue all the way up to Moonbus lament about people that have a lot of money, Zahlanzi would be included along with Shav about getting money from the wealthy to give free housing to non-workers. Such as that, surely you get my drift. And Sue??? Sue Says businessmen should not be in government...understand that I have to field this stuff each day.
Where did I ever say I was against billionaires? I am AGAINST billionaires using their wealth to BUY influence over the businesses they run, getting better loan percents and such and getting a juicy contract they first have to grease the wheels to get noticed.
That is EXACTLY what went on, what is going on RIGHT now, Musk LITERALLY buying the presidency for Trump and the bi ...[text shortened]... e would throw his MOTHER under the bus if that got him out of trouble like he already did with Rudy,
None of you make any sense, you ruin the crux of any post, when you talk down about people who are really rich. But you neber say successful and smart,,,,oh, and seemingly good businessmen, considering.
So say what you will, it is my belief that all libs seem to be of the same ilk. Billionaires cannot be billionaires without grift and bribes!!!!!!!!!!
Whatever. So you gonna put the ice cream man on the Cabinet board and kick off billionaires.............because they are billionaires....because they are billionaires.
Jesus. Sue, you reading this?
@sonhouse saidI'll answer this one tomorrow, maybe dispell your hand-wringing.
You can't seem to comprehend, a dollar is still a dollar, it bought more back then but that doesn't change the fact the country ran on money. If a car cost 1000 dollars back then and now 30,000 that changes nothing.
If you made 200 bucks a month as a guess, you had money to buy that thousand dollar car on loan same as someone making 30 dollars an hour now and buying a 30 ...[text shortened]... made the depression even worse:
https://www.investopedia.com/terms/s/smoot-hawley-tariff-act.asp
There is only one thing that could stop a future of great success, MAGA, but I ain't about to air it.
BTW, this post could have been whittled down a lot shorter, too long a post can cause folks to drift.
Did you just link Smoot-Hawley? Help me Rhonda
@moonbus saidin order for the truth to matter, there must be consequences for lying.
You will, I am sure, have noticed that Trump has stated that he "was not friendly with Epstein," which is not the issue.
trump has exhausted everyone and he can say pretty much everything he wants.
if there would be pictures published of him snorting cocaine out of epstein's belly button, with a tropical beach in the background, there would still be garbage people defending him here.
@Metal-Brain saidhow about you take your meds and i ignore you
I can be loyal to someone and disagree with that someone. Do you agree with everything Trump says without exception?
@Metal-Brain saidWhat a fool.
Like the Hunter laptop? LOL!
You lie just like the CIA and FBI. The laptop was real and loaded with porn selfies and drug use. And he called his dad Pedo Pete. Pedophile Joe smelling little girl's hair constantly. But he is your pedophile so you defend him every time.
That is why Joe allowed genocide in Gaza. He was Israel's puppet just like Trump is.
@Metal-Brain saidDid you get this from Global Research or some other Russian disinformation site?
Why did Trump let the Israeli spies that stole our secrets go?
You are concealing your inability to answer that with an ad hominem attack.
Trump let the Israeli spies go because he is a traitor to this country and a puppet to Israel. It is obvious. If he did that for Russian spies you would be screaming for Trump's impeachment and you know it.
You are loyal to Trump but who is he loyal to? Israel!
@AverageJoe1 saidDoes 'paranoid schizophrenic' have any meaning for you?
Shouse, is he under any charges? If not, what is your problem other than hate. Write about something useful....ask Marauder how he can write tomes defending the reading of sexual explicit content to grade-school children, in the liberal hope that the children will go home and try it all out, and become losers in Marauder's society....his goal to bring us all down. Wrte that. Or, for more fun agree with him/
I recommend anti-psychotics.
1 edit
@AverageJoe1 saidSo now you have problems recognizing sarcasm?
@AverageJoe1 said
""This post, much longer than a post from Wealthy Elites, page 4, by Sue, (the word 'you' 19 times), does not contain the word 'you' even one time.""
Hey Sonhhouse, this was your immediate response to this post of mine....
"Oh, well I guess THAT means Trump is exonerated of all charges then after that DEVESTATING rebuttal.""
Are you OK??
@AverageJoe1 saidLithium is your friend.
I'll answer this one tomorrow, maybe dispell your hand-wringing.
There is only one thing that could stop a future of great success, MAGA, but I ain't about to air it.
BTW, this post could have been whittled down a lot shorter, too long a post can cause folks to drift.
Did you just link Smoot-Hawley? Help me Rhonda
@AverageJoe1 saidIt is a clear conflict of interest.
And Sue??? Sue Says businessmen should not be in government...understand that I have to field this stuff each day.
@AverageJoe1 saidWhich is too bad. You might have to make the determination Trans folks are actually human beings, not fake one.
SHouse. I don't read tran posts. I predict that I will never know one.
How Terrible THAT would be. I know.
1 edit
@sonhouse said??? I don't have to 'determine' any such thing. If I see a human being at the gas station, it is 2nd nature to know that it is a human being. What do you mean determine.? Tell us. You never close your posts.
Which is too bad. You might have to make the determination Trans folks are actually human beings, not fake one.
How Terrible THAT would be. I know.
And there is nothing terrible about a human being what they want to be. But they have nothing to do with the guy standing next to them regarding their human status. The ole in-your-face flag that they carry around. Jesus. You be you, me be me. That would work.
@Suzianne saidSue says that businessman in government is a conflict of interest. If Sue’s church had need of guidance in the running of their offices, their budget, etc., she would not hire a businessman. Pray Tell Sue, who would you hire?
It is a clear conflict of interest.
Respectfully, awaiting a non-answer
@AverageJoe1 saidWhen the topic is business, get a businessman.
Sue says that businessman in government is a conflict of interest. If Sue’s church had need of guidance in the running of their offices, their budget, etc., she would not hire a businessman. Pray Tell Sue, who would you hire?
Respectfully, awaiting a non-answer
When the topic is government, why get a businessman?
Would you get a plumber to fix your circuit breaker box?
Business hates government. Putting a businessman in charge is a recipe for disaster.