Originally posted by yo its meI see what your saying and understand it
That 'free market'- servival of the fitist?
Funding it? Idealy all that money Bush spends on his forign affairs would be redircted.
[b]the welfare system at present is just getting by by this are you saying familys on welfare couldn't afford to contribute because their money just meets ends or that the govenment it stretching it's self to pay the welfare system?
Isn't the US ment to be rich?[/b]
But is it not meant to encourage development in oneself ?
For exmaple, in the UK (where I live) their is a welfare state, but some many people just live off it and honestly don't care about getting a job (chavs)
Originally posted by karnachzThe WHO rankings are not an objective measure of the relative performance of national health care systems. In fact, they have a strong idealogical component:
Why, so it can be down with the US at around #37 in healthcare compared to other countries?
http://www.cato.org/pubs/bp/bp101.pdf
Originally posted by der schwarze Ritter😴
The WHO rankings are not an objective measure of the relative performance of national health care systems. In fact, they have a strong idealogical component:
http://www.cato.org/pubs/bp/bp101.pdf
Ok. Here's a task. Find a health ranking where the US is above either France, the UK or Canada.
