Go back
Dr. Ralph Baric, U of NC and Fort Detrick

Dr. Ralph Baric, U of NC and Fort Detrick

Debates


Dr. Ralph Baric worked with SHC014-CoV at the University of North Carolina.

https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2015/11/151110115711.htm

Fort Detrick was shut down by the CDC for violating safety protocols. The corporate news media will not inform you of these important topics.

Either it is propaganda by omission or the corporate news media are incompetent idiots that don't care about attracting viewers and making more money from reporting these stories of great interest. Which do you think it is?


@metal-brain said
Dr. Ralph Baric worked with SHC014-CoV at the University of North Carolina.

https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2015/11/151110115711.htm

Fort Detrick was shut down by the CDC for violating safety protocols. The corporate news media will not inform you of these important topics.

Either it is propaganda by omission or the corporate news media are incompetent i ...[text shortened]... wers and making more money from reporting these stories of great interest. Which do you think it is?
The CDC does its job 🤷🏻 How is that a newsworthy ‘hold the front page’ story.


@kevcvs57 said
The CDC does its job 🤷🏻 How is that a newsworthy ‘hold the front page’ story.
I think it is more about how Fort Detrick does it's job. The danger of all these labs on humanity is newsworthy.

Dr. Ralph Baric created SARS2 in the U of NC lab. I think that is very newsworthy.


The USA is just as suspect for a lab leak as any nation.
Why do you think the the USA was the epicenter of the pandemic early on? How is that not suspect?

Vote Up
Vote Down

China will not let go of suspicion of Fort Detrick.
Can you blame them?


@Metal-Brain

How much do those tin foil hats cost?

Vote Up
Vote Down

@very-musty said
@Metal-Brain

How much do those tin foil hats cost?
LOL!
Is that what you said when the Wuhan lab was accused of it?

If the possibility that it happened from Fort Detrick becomes mainstream like Wuhan has will you still spew ad hominem attacks to marginalize?

Fort Detrick was shut down for not following safety protocols.
Are you aware of that?

1 edit

It came from Wuhan.

End of story.

The only reason why China is spreading rumors is because the media is investigating Wuhan more than ever now.


@Metal-Brain

I thought you were a conservative but no...

You're a conspiracy theories nut 🤔

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

@metal-brain said
The USA is just as suspect for a lab leak as any nation.
Why do you think the the USA was the epicenter of the pandemic early on? How is that not suspect?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TEQdQUa05hU
@MB - "Why do you think the the USA was the epicenter of the pandemic early on?"

Well, let's count the ways. The top two countries in international travel are 1. China and 2. USA. Does that work?

And just as an aside, the first case of COVID in USA was on Jan 19, 2021, a traveler.
China had beat that by months. How's the math working?


@Earl-of-Trumps

He will have to readjust his tin foil hats for that one 🤔

Vote Up
Vote Down

@earl-of-trumps said
@MB - "Why do you think the the USA was the epicenter of the pandemic early on?"

Well, let's count the ways. The top two countries in international travel are 1. China and 2. USA. Does that work?

And just as an aside, the first case of COVID in USA was on Jan 19, 2021, a traveler.
China had beat that by months. How's the math working?
Were Covid 19 tests available in the US before then? If not they were counted as flu cases. You cannot count lost numbers.

Vote Up
Vote Down

@very-musty said
@Earl-of-Trumps

He will have to readjust his tin foil hats for that one 🤔
What do you think the origin is? Be honest.

Vote Up
Vote Down

@metal-brain said
What do you think the origin is? Be honest.
Wuhan Lab

China.

Vote Up
Vote Down

@metal-brain said
Were Covid 19 tests available in the US before then? If not they were counted as flu cases. You cannot count lost numbers.
You can't count China's lost numbers either. And theirs are controversial. It may be earlier than that.
You have nothing here but an improbable, flimsily supported theory.