1. Standard memberRJHinds
    The Near Genius
    Fort Gordon
    Joined
    24 Jan '11
    Moves
    13644
    24 Sep '15 05:38
    Snowden’s leaks didn’t harm national security

    YouTube
  2. Standard memberRJHinds
    The Near Genius
    Fort Gordon
    Joined
    24 Jan '11
    Moves
    13644
    24 Sep '15 10:16
    9/05/2015: Edward Snowden Speaks Out: “Hillary Clinton", "The Donald", & "Freedom"

    YouTube
  3. Account suspended
    Joined
    02 Jan '15
    Moves
    10189
    25 Sep '15 12:344 edits
    "In March 2014, Army General Martin Dempsey, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, told the House Armed Services Committee, "The vast majority of the documents that Snowden … exfiltrated from our highest levels of security … had nothing to do with exposing government oversight of domestic activities. The vast majority of those were related to our military capabilities, operations, tactics, techniques and procedures."[86] When retired NSA director Keith Alexander was asked in a May 2014 interview to quantify the number of documents Snowden stole, Alexander answered, "I don't think anybody really knows what he actually took with him, because the way he did it, we don't have an accurate way of counting. What we do have an accurate way of counting is what he touched, what he may have downloaded, and that was more than a million documents."

    No way of knowing how much damage he did.

    I gotta say he comes across as being really intelligent in this interview, I always pictured him as being a shy jerky douchebag nerd.

    YouTube
  4. Standard memberRJHinds
    The Near Genius
    Fort Gordon
    Joined
    24 Jan '11
    Moves
    13644
    26 Sep '15 23:481 edit
    I believe Edward Snowden's intention was to be a whistleblower on the government gathering too much information on all citizens. In other words it was the U.S. government that was spying on the people.

    "You're Being Watched": Edward Snowden Emerges as Source Behind Explosive Revelations of NSA Spying

    YouTube
  5. Standard memberbill718
    Enigma
    Seattle
    Joined
    03 Sep '06
    Moves
    3298
    27 Sep '15 02:56
    Originally posted by RJHinds
    Snowden’s leaks didn’t harm national security

    [youtube]pxMB6Kl8BsA[/youtube]
    I'm not sure on this one. I don't like Mr. Snowden's methods, but I admire with his motives. There are far too many "dirty little secrets" our government keeps under wraps under the guise of "national security"
  6. Subscribershavixmir
    Guppy poo
    Sewers of Holland
    Joined
    31 Jan '04
    Moves
    87832
    27 Sep '15 07:39
    Surely a spy is per definition working for a state?
  7. Standard memberRJHinds
    The Near Genius
    Fort Gordon
    Joined
    24 Jan '11
    Moves
    13644
    27 Sep '15 08:52
    Originally posted by bill718
    I'm not sure on this one. I don't like Mr. Snowden's methods, but I admire with his motives. There are far too many "dirty little secrets" our government keeps under wraps under the guise of "national security"
    I am not sure that if he had used another method things would have turned out any better, since he is fighting against a powerful government and he would certainly be sitting in prison right now.
  8. Account suspended
    Joined
    02 Jan '15
    Moves
    10189
    27 Sep '15 12:07
    Originally posted by bill718
    I'm not sure on this one. I don't like Mr. Snowden's methods, but I admire with his motives. There are far too many "dirty little secrets" our government keeps under wraps under the guise of "national security"
    Reminds me of the scene in Casablanca when the French chief of police blows his whistle and announces Nick's Place is shut down, when Bogart asks why he says "I'm shocked ...SHOCKED to find gambling going on here" then two seconds later an employee hands him a big wad of bills and says "your winnings, sir".
    So the Big Bad USA monitors radio air traffic of all sorts ....OMG stop the presses......so does every other modern country as part of their national security.
  9. Standard memberAThousandYoung
    or different places
    tinyurl.com/2tp8tyx8
    Joined
    23 Aug '04
    Moves
    26660
    28 Sep '15 05:51
    Originally posted by shavixmir
    Surely a spy is per definition working for a state?
    wikipedia.org/wiki/Harriet_the_Spy
  10. Joined
    18 Jan '07
    Moves
    12444
    29 Sep '15 21:29
    Originally posted by shavixmir
    Surely a spy is per definition working for a state?
    Erm... industrial spionage?
Back to Top

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.I Agree