02 Apr '11 06:05>
Originally posted by AThousandYoungThe answer is in a post 4 up from this one.
What if the big bum says both boxes belong to him?
Originally posted by WajomaOh, ok. You don't have an answer.
I'll save us both some time eh:
"No it isn''t."
"Yes it is."
Originally posted by WajomaNah, actually you're too dopey and dishonest for me to want to interact with any more. However, I want to make sure other people can see through your self-righteous BS, so I am putting in some time.
hehe, yes I do, it's there in the post.
My this is fun. Are you having fun, it's like being 5 years old all over again.
Originally posted by AThousandYoungYou've learned your lesson for the day, so no worries:
Nah, actually you're too dopey and dishonest for me to want to interact with any more. However, I want to make sure other people can see through your self-righteous BS, so I am putting in some time.
Originally posted by WajomaIs it capitalism if I have to pay someone to prevent the gummint men with guns from kicking me out of my home?
You've learned your lesson for the day, so no worries:
To be a capitalist you do not need to own a cardboard box, or x number of cardboard boxes, or if you do own a cardboard box that does not mean you can not be a capitalist. In fact no reputable definition of capitalism mentions cardboard boxes.
It's a small step.
Originally posted by AThousandYoungYou'd better take that one up with No1, he's the one claiming capitalism is only possible with the states approval, I would say that the state more often than not is the one violating property rights, if you read back through to how all this started it was I saying that the scenarios set up in Ireland and your example in the US were not the result of capitalism, you can't blaim capitalism, but you do because of your woeful compreheshion of what it is.
Is it capitalism if I have to pay someone to prevent the gummint men with guns from kicking me out of my home?
Originally posted by WajomaYou consistently confuse any market with the particular type of economic organization called capitalism. All economic systems recognize an individual can possess property and none (including capitalism) have no restraints on ownership of property.
It is based on your right to your property No1, it doesn't take the state, all it takes is two people that recognise those rights in each other.
Originally posted by WajomaThat, my friends, is intellectual dishonesty.
You'd better take that one up with No1, he's the one claiming capitalism is only possible with the states approval, I would say that the state more often than not is the one violating property rights, if you read back through to how all this started it was I saying that the scenarios set up in Ireland and your example in the US were not the result of capitali ...[text shortened]... is.
I don't know the details of your circumstance so obviously I cannot comment on them.