Originally posted by moon1969There's that "should" word again. Let's be clear. What happened is an unspeakable tragedy. I cannot imagine the horror that town and those families are going through. This is basically a whole town's population's lives ruined. But banning guns will be as effective as getting them out of the hands of criminals as banning crack has been.
The NRA and gun nuts should be ashamed.
Advocating the responsible and legal use of firearms, and upholding the Constitution, is a duty. This is where that whole "feeling vs thinking" thing comes in. We're united in our outrage over what happened today. It's unspeakable. But tearing up the Constitution isn't the answer.
Originally posted by SoothfastIf you can explain how banning something which kills more than ten times the people that are killed by guns every year is more retarded then banning guns I'm all ears. Is it about the loss of life? If so my proposal is much more effective. Or could it be about something else?
Don't be a retard.