1. Standard memberno1marauder
    Naturally Right
    Somewhere Else
    Joined
    22 Jun '04
    Moves
    42677
    15 Jun '13 15:59
    Originally posted by moon1969
    The statements your refer are in regard to enforcement, and never say or indicate that the President does not have a right (or obligation) to make a constitutional determination.

    I never addressed the issue of enforcement, but only that all three branches of government make constitutional assessments of laws.

    Nevertheless, you are wrong to suggest t ...[text shortened]... tice of the Supreme Court has something to say about what is and what will be settled precedent.
    He has one vote.

    Settled law is still; laws are presumed Constitutional and the President is obliged to obey the law. If he wishes to challenge that, he goes to the courts - he is not permitted to make unilateral determinations and act upon them.
Back to Top

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.I Agree