Go back
Face/off

Face/off

Debates

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Surgeons have battled for years to carry out this revolutionary operation, the final transplant summit to be conquered.

As many will know a woman savaged by a dog has had the worlds first face transplant the 38-year-old lost her, nose, lips, and chin in the attack in May and underwent surgery as soon as a suitable mach was found. Many thought it would never be done and many still think it should never be done because of the huge ethical dilemmas, but what if it goes wrong won't she be even more disfigured? and then when this operation becomes more common a worry has to be that it will be used as a cosmetic or even criminal reasons?
any views?

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/4484728.stm

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by leestatic
Surgeons have battled for years to carry out this revolutionary operation, the final transplant summit to be conquered.

As many will know a woman savaged by a dog has had the worlds first face transplant the 38-year-old lost her, nose, lips, and chin in the attack in May and underwent surgery as soon as a suitable mach was found. Many thought it would n ...[text shortened]... cosmetic or even criminal reasons?
any views?

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/4484728.stm
If the old face suffered from acne, would the new one too?

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by invigorate
If the old face suffered from acne, would the new one too?
How will she face her family?
The dog?

Vote Up
Vote Down

The film's crap.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by invigorate
If the old face suffered from acne, would the new one too?
Good question. The procedure is basically a very extensive skin graft; nerves, fat and skin are replaced, but the underlying bone and muscle structure is left alone (according to the description I read on the BBC News site). Therefore, the face will presumably resemble the original face more than it will resemble the donor's. Differences will literally be superficial -- the acne question is a good one because I think most factors influencing acne are genetic, but I don't know how the genes react to having different skin to manipulate.

I don't really see any new ethical issues, since I get the impression that face transplants alter the appearance less than extreme Jackoesque cosmetic surgery.

Vote Up
Vote Down

I've always fancied having the face of a Palestinian suicide bomber. You can find them hanging on trees in Israel just about every Tuesday.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Amaurote
I've always fancied having the face of a Palestinian suicide bomber. You can find them hanging on trees in Israel just about every Tuesday.
LOL

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by royalchicken
Good question. The procedure is basically a very extensive skin graft; nerves, fat and skin are replaced, but the underlying bone and muscle structure is left alone (according to the description I read on the BBC News site). Therefore, the face will presumably resemble the original face more than it will resemble the donor's. Differences will liter ...[text shortened]... ession that face transplants alter the appearance less than extreme Jackoesque cosmetic surgery.
What story did you read? In the link posted by the OP, it said:

"In the controversial operation, tissues, muscles, arteries and veins were taken from a brain-dead donor.."

This was from a BBC news site.

Vote Up
Vote Down

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/4484766.stm