Go back
Fauci whistleblower

Fauci whistleblower

Debates

Vote Up
2
Vote Down
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down
-2

-Removed-
That is not the same think as censorship.

It also does not make wiki an authoritative source.

2 edits
Vote Up
1
Vote Down
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down
-2

-Removed-
No news source is authoritative, especially anything mainstream. Those are all establishment propaganda outlets, including Fox.

Vote Up
1
Vote Down
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down
-2

-Removed-
Not mainstream. It all might as well be Pravda.

Vote Up
1
Vote Down
Vote Up
Vote Down
-3

@divegeester

Look, FB is trying to censor the entire web.

https://www.protocol.com/facebook-oversight-board-rules-of-the-internet

Vote Up
1
Vote Down

@eladar said
@divegeester

Look, FB is trying to censor the entire web.

https://www.protocol.com/facebook-oversight-board-rules-of-the-internet
Wassup elader are you worried that they’ll take down enough disinformation to get Biden elected.

Vote Up
1
Vote Down
Vote Up
2
Vote Down

-Removed-
A scientist Eledar trusts is full of crap. Surprise.

Vote Up
Vote Down
-2

What is funny about everyone saying "she's been discredited - look! Wikipedia says so" is this: Making a claim that is discredited happens often in the scientific community. Did they revoke her PhD in Biochemistry and Molecular Biology?

https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2018/10/what-massive-database-retracted-papers-reveals-about-science-publishing-s-death-penalty

Vote Up
1
Vote Down
Vote Up
Vote Down

@joe-shmo said
What is funny about everyone saying "she's been discredited - look! Wikipedia says so" is this: Making a claim that is discredited happens often in the scientific community. Did they revoke her PhD in Biochemistry and Molecular Biology?

https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2018/10/what-massive-database-retracted-papers-reveals-about-science-publishing-s-death-penalty
You link to an article that mentions that two out of every 10,000 papers are retracted, and this is "often" in your view?

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down