@kevcvs57 saidI am absolutely convinced that this is NOT a free world where people like kevcvs57 can freely slander and insult all those who present some arguments contrary their views. It is not a free discussion here if some paid trolls will immediately slander all those who present any arguments against joining NATO.
And your a Kremlin mouthpiece who shouldn’t really get to talk but hey welcome to the free world.
Moreover, the arguments I have presented have been invented by the US strategists of the Cold War era.
@kevcvs57 saidSome specific missiles and radars can be deployed nearer to Russian borders. Even asking so incompetent questions means that there can be no rational discussion about these issues as the publicity in the West does not know the most fundamental facts about the situation, the censorship is used as an "argument" and if anyone presents the information needed, one will be immediately accused of spreading the "Russian propaganda".
“ The only thing that matters is that Russia is afraid that its nuclear deterrence against the US will be seriously decreased. The situation is similar to that of the Cuban crisis. ”
How exactly does Sweden and Finland joining NATO decrease Russias ability to destroy the world. There is only one reason that these countries have changed their attitude to NATO membership and it’s name is Putin.
That user kevcvs57 has no morality or self-respect whatsoever because one intentionally asks questions to reject the answers as "Russian propaganda" even if the answers are plainly true and proven to be true.
But the very existence of such an ideology in the Western world is itself the best argument against joining NATO. After you belong to NATO, you can never get back your freedom of speech again and you remain forever in the infobubble controlled by such political instructors.
@eintaluj saidYeah that’s the reason that your posts are so uselessly anachronistic you are still fighting the Cold War.
I am absolutely convinced that this is NOT a free world where people like kevcvs57 can freely slander and insult all those who present some arguments contrary their views. It is not a free discussion here if some paid trolls will immediately slander all those who present any arguments against joining NATO.
Moreover, the arguments I have presented have been invented by the US strategists of the Cold War era.
The Cold War is done and this pure unadulterated aggressive expansionism by the Putin regime can only be seen as that.
There is no ideological mask for the Russian imperialists to hide behind, you cannot get away with “workers of the world unite” from the prow of your luxury yacht. The Putin regime is an oppressive regime at home and a warmongering wort on the face of the world abroad.
@eintaluj saidI may not always agree with your posts but your statements are always very well thought out. I appreciate your contributions and look forward to discussions with you in the future.
"Is this an example of 'aggressive NATO expansion'?"
- Russia and the US both have approximately 5000 nuclear warheads. Europe has (in France and the UK) a few hundred nuclear warheads. The expansion of NATO near Russian borders is regarded as a security threat by Russia. Russia warned in 2021 to stop it by military/technical means if required. The Russian invasion of Uk ...[text shortened]... , the guilt, however, is mainly on the US.
Only the US can profit from the escalation in Europe.
1 edit
@eintaluj said“ Some specific missiles and radars can be deployed nearer to Russian borders. Even asking so incompetent questions means that there can be no rational discussion about these issues as the publicity in the West does not know the most fundamental facts about the situation,”
Some specific missiles and radars can be deployed nearer to Russian borders. Even asking so incompetent questions means that there can be no rational discussion about these issues as the publicity in the West does not know the most fundamental facts about the situation, the censorship is used as an "argument" and if anyone presents the information needed, one will be immedia ...[text shortened]... m of speech again and you remain forever in the infobubble controlled by such political instructors.
Then argue that certain missiles and radars should not be stationed adjacent to Russias borders by nato, do not imply that violent invasion is an acceptable response to a sovereign state so much as asking to join a voluntary defence alliance or even a voluntary economic bloc. Russia does not have the right to veto the decisions of another sovereign state and until you and the Russian hierarchy understand that reality Russia will be at some level of war footing with its neighbours and those neighbours will look to a system of communal defence.