Go back
Fishy?

Fishy?

Debates

N
Lippy Brat

Joined
15 Apr 06
Moves
9667
Clock
10 Oct 08
Vote Up
Vote Down

I'd completely forgotten about the North American Union and the development of the Amero until this morning when I got thinking about the market & currency crash / crisis the US is currently going through.

The economic crisis that the US is currently facing seems to be rather reminiscent of the 1920's crisis or "Great Depression" as it was called with the pattern of expanding then recalling the dollar and all the debts and credit outstanding. Banks and business are going bankrupt and already people are finding themselves unemployed.
This excuse may be the best time possible for Bush to formally introduce the NAU and its new currency as it's own "bail out".

"People in the U.S. are going to be hit hard," Chapman warned. "In the severe recession we are entering now, Bush will argue that we have to form a North American Union to compete with the Euro."

"Creating the Amero," Chapman explained, "will be presented to the American public as the administration's solution for dollar recovery. In the process of creating the Amero, the Bush administration just abandons the dollar." "

Rest of the article found here:
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=53350

Is it odd that something this big was singed back in 2005 without congress and the people knowing about it (probably very widely known now) and am I being a little too paranoid in thinking that the timing since 9/11, the subsequent war and now the economic crash all seem a little too convenient?

I have a feeling that Bush will bring these changes in before he steps down, poor Obama will be pinned with the blame (as Noobs tend to do) and the good ol republics will "step back in too clean up the mess".
What worries me though, is that by creating the NAU, wouldn't that render the Constitution completely redundant?

On the NAU: http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=14965
On the Depression: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Depression#Debt

dsR

Big D

Joined
13 Dec 05
Moves
26380
Clock
10 Oct 08
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Natsia
...I have a feeling that Bush will bring these changes in before he steps down, poor Obama will be pinned with the blame (as Noobs tend to do) and the good ol republics will "step back in too clean up the mess".
What worries me though, is that by creating the NAU, wouldn't that render the Constitution completely redundant?

On the NAU: http://www.humaneve ...[text shortened]... m/article.php?id=14965
On the Depression: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Depression#Debt
I wouldn't worry about another Great Depression because there are far too many smart people in Washington, D.C., trying to fix this (Nancy Pelosi, Barney Frank, Fred Raines, Obama...).

Although he toppled the Iraqi government in two weeks, I doubt even President Bush could create a North American Union in three weeks.

You should be worried about an NAU, because the freedoms we enjoy in America now would be cast aside in any bastardized conglomeration of Canada, the United States and Mexico. There's a whole host of freedom of speech issues Canada does not afford its citizens, and Mexico...well Mexico is Mexico.

Bosse de Nage
Zellulärer Automat

Spiel des Lebens

Joined
27 Jan 05
Moves
90892
Clock
10 Oct 08
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by der schwarze Ritter

Although he toppled the Iraqi government in two weeks, I doubt even President Bush could create a North American Union in three weeks.
Good at breaking things, isn't he?

N
Lippy Brat

Joined
15 Apr 06
Moves
9667
Clock
10 Oct 08
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by der schwarze Ritter
I wouldn't worry about another Great Depression because there are far too many smart people in Washington, D.C., trying to fix this (Nancy Pelosi, Barney Frank, Fred Raines, Obama...).

Although he toppled the Iraqi government in two weeks, I doubt even President Bush could create a North American Union in three weeks.

You should be worried ...[text shortened]... edom of speech issues Canada does not afford its citizens, and Mexico...well Mexico is Mexico.
The NAU was created in 2005, hun. Signed and sold. Bush is looking to have it up and running by 2010.

See the second last article quoted.

"To that end, the Task Force proposes the creation by 2010 of a North American community to enhance security, prosperity, and opportunity.We propose a community based on the principle affirmed in the March 2005 Joint Statement of the three leaders that "our security and prosperity are mutually dependent and complementary." Its boundaries will be defined by a common external tariff and an outer security perimeter within which the movement of people, products, and capital will be legal, orderly and safe. Its goal will be to guarantee a free, secure, just, and prosperous North America."

Bosse de Nage
Zellulärer Automat

Spiel des Lebens

Joined
27 Jan 05
Moves
90892
Clock
10 Oct 08
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Natsia
The NAU was created in 2005, hun.
It's normally spelt 'hon', but this spelling fits this case better ...

S

Joined
18 Dec 06
Moves
15780
Clock
10 Oct 08
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Bosse de Nage
It's normally spelt 'hon', but this spelling fits this case better ...
With a capital H

N
Lippy Brat

Joined
15 Apr 06
Moves
9667
Clock
10 Oct 08
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Bosse de Nage
It's normally spelt 'hon', but this spelling fits this case better ...
Jee, thanks.

u
The So Fist

Voice of Reason

Joined
28 Mar 06
Moves
9908
Clock
10 Oct 08
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Natsia
I'd completely forgotten about the North American Union and the development of the Amero until this morning when I got thinking about the market & currency crash / crisis the US is currently going through.

The economic crisis that the US is currently facing seems to be rather reminiscent of the 1920's crisis or "Great Depression" as it was called with the ...[text shortened]... 14965
On the Depression: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Depression#Debt
What makes you think Canada will go along with this? This won't happen until a Conservative majority is elected to office here...and even then, the case for the Amero is a weak one here.

Nemesio
Ursulakantor

Pittsburgh, PA

Joined
05 Mar 02
Moves
34824
Clock
10 Oct 08
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by der schwarze Ritter
Although he toppled the Iraqi government in two weeks...
Founded on his 'knowledge' that nu-cu-lar and bio-weapons were hidden all over.

And, in 'protecting' the American people from these 'weapons,' he's pissed away how much money?

Last I checked, going into massive debt was bad for a country.

Yeah, he's been a really great President.

Nemesio

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.