@Earl-of-Trumps
If they didn't take any files it would have been BECAUSE they were republican.
How are you going to prove the Russians didn't take any files off those DEMOCRAT computers? Just copy and paste and how is anyone supposed to know, especially if they mess up the timeline so people can't follow the trail?
You seem very naive when it comes to computers and you ALWAYS follow the Trump lines.
Still sounds to me like you work for Putin and Trump and are anti American.
@sonhouse saidI through that out as a piece of evidence.
@Earl-of-Trumps
And OF COURSE you believe Julian because that fits your MO.
Assange said something to the effect of "Trump and his clowns would not
know how to do this".
And by the way, what did Trump do to make him an accomplice, anyway? Seriously.
If I *know* that Jim is going to rob a bank because someone told me, does that
make me guilty of anything? No.
Trump did nothing as an accomplice, *whoever* did it.
If they didn't take any files it would have been BECAUSE they were republican.
And you know this how? Please. you don't know booboo.
How are you going to prove the Russians didn't take any files off those DEMOCRAT computers? Just copy and paste and how is anyone supposed to know, especially if they mess up the timeline so people can't follow the trail?
I'm not out to prove anything. Showing evidences that are strong.
You seem very naive when it comes to computers and you ALWAYS follow the Trump lines.
Pat yourself on the back, big muscle boy but you don't know any more about it
than I do, all we have is public information.
As far as you continually saying I am a Trump adorer and I say whatever he says,, you're lying in plain English. Trump never said Seth Rich stole the data, *I* did.
You just can't talk to someone without insulting them can you.
Still sounds to me like you work for Putin and Trump and are anti American.
1 edit
@earl-of-trumps saidThe Senate Intelligence Committee has concluded that the Russian government interfered in the 2016 election, that members of Trump's campaign had numerous contacts with Russians welcoming such aid and the interactions posed a "grave threat" to the US. https://apnews.com/5e833a62e9492f6a66624b7920cc846a
https://www.nytimes.com/reuters/2020/08/14/us/politics/14reuters-usa-trump-russia.html
Former FBI Lawyer to Plead Guilty as Part of Russia Probe: Defendant's Lawyer
[quote]WASHINGTON — A former FBI lawyer will plead guilty to falsifying a document as part of a federal probe into the origins of an investigation into possible contacts between Donald Trump's ...[text shortened]... ent
people knew a long time ago.
The Russia probe was a HOAX, top to bottom. Crooked democrats.
Some "hoax".
@no1marauder saidI saw that and am surprised. But the report does not come to that exact conclusion, only some kind of probable.
The Senate Intelligence Committee has concluded that the Russian government interfered in the 2016 election, that members of Trump's campaign had numerous contacts with Russians welcoming such aid and the interactions posed a "grave threat" to the US. https://apnews.com/5e833a62e9492f6a66624b7920cc846a
Some "hoax".
Still surprised. I really am.