@Mott-The-Hoople saidYawn.
😂 Fox has a “mixed” rating. that means they report BOTH sides
your link has a “high” left bias
and you think you have a point…😂
You conveniently skipped this part about Fox News:
"Questionable due to the promotion of propaganda, conspiracy theories, pseudoscience, the use of poor sources, and numerous false claims and failed fact checks."
Ouch.
@Mott-The-Hoople saidFrom your link:
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/new-republic/
"We also rate them High for factual reporting due to proper sourcing of information and a clean fact check record."
LMFAO. Thanks for posting, Mott.
@Mott-The-Hoople saidBoth sides of opinionated lunacy does not count as objective news reporting.
😂 Fox has a “mixed” rating. that means they report BOTH sides
your link has a “high” left bias
and you think you have a point…😂
1 edit
@KellyJay saidMany of these news platforms are themselves passing on reports which come from either AP or Reuters, both of which are acknowledged responsible (accountable) journalism.
Who exactly are you referring to CNN, ABC, CBS and MSNBC these guys are forever using the same words to describe the same thing nothing independent about them.
@KellyJay saidAnd I also use the BBC, Guardian, PBS, Associated Press, The Independent, the Wall Street Journal....
Who exactly are you referring to CNN, ABC, CBS and MSNBC these guys are forever using the same words to describe the same thing nothing independent about them.
Meanwhile that Fox News anchor's source was her "friend's wife".
@KellyJay
What do you want? Your god to come down and go "I condemn MSMBC and Rachel Maddow in particular for her false reporting'.
Do you not care for independent review of news sites?
Do you for instance not believe Fox news is biased in favor of Trump and publishes really stupid pieces showing how great Trump is but when fact checked the finding is inevitably BS writing hoping the public won't catch on.?
@Mott-The-Hoople said1) Provide link for your claim
pbs reported that Trump asked Netanyahu to not accept the ceases fire deal with hamas, is that true?
2) This is why you have to use multiple sources. Not just one, like how conservatives are with only watching Fox.
@moonbus saidExactly. If they are not a news organization, this would remove freedom of the press concerns about their activities and might open them up to prosecution.
It’s not entertaining to shout “Fire!” in a theater when there is no fire. It’s high time the justice system held people accountable for inciting stampedes. Otherwise, America is steaming full speed ahead for another iceberg on Jan. 6th 2025.