@Mott-The-Hoople saidPlease give us your expert legal reasons for believing so.
how many think this sham trial by a liberal judge and jury will be overturned?
I do
The supposed political leanings of the judge and jury aren't sufficient.
@no1marauder saidLMFAO…are you pretending to be a legal expert?
Please give us your expert legal reasons for believing so.
The supposed political leanings of the judge and jury aren't sufficient.
@Mott-The-Hoople saidHe is a lawyer.
LMFAO…are you pretending to be a legal expert?
-and you are not.
@Mott-The-Hoople saidActually, I am in NY Criminal Law, so I don't have to "pretend".
LMFAO…are you pretending to be a legal expert?
But even if you falsely believe differently (you have many false beliefs so this would be just another), the question asked was what legal reasons you have for believing this conviction will be overturned.
Do you have any?
@Sleepyguy saidAs you surely know, I never make predictions about jury verdicts. I didn't make one here or in either of those cases.
Well, yeah, he's a lawyer but his batting average is a little low with juries. Ask Trayvon and Michael Brown. But hey get a crooked leftist judge and a jury from a 90% Democrat district and no1's a great lawyer LOL.
But if any of you clowns ever get around to expressing actual legal reasons why this conviction should be overturned, I'm certainly willing to evaluate them based on NY Criminal Law and esp. the results of appeals.
I can tell you for sure that whining about the supposed political makeup of the jury is not a winning strategy in NY State criminal appeals.
@no1marauder saidI'm not interested in your legal opinions or evaluations. This is just hardball politics, and I would never expect anything to go Trump's way in New York.
As you surely know, I never make predictions about jury verdicts. I didn't make one here or in either of those cases.
But if any of you clowns ever get around to expressing actual legal reasons why this conviction should be overturned, I'm certainly willing to evaluate them based on NY Criminal Law and esp. the results of appeals.
I can tell you for sure that whini ...[text shortened]... ut the supposed political makeup of the jury is not a winning strategy in NY State criminal appeals.
@no1marauder said“Actually, I am in NY Criminal Law, so I don't have to "pretend". “
Actually, I am in NY Criminal Law, so I don't have to "pretend".
But even if you falsely believe differently (you have many false beliefs so this would be just another), the question asked was what legal reasons you have for believing this conviction will be overturned.
Do you have any?
which side?
So, you ARE NOT a lawyer?
@no1marauder saidscared is another way to put it
As you surely know, I never make predictions about jury verdicts. I didn't make one here or in either of those cases.
But if any of you clowns ever get around to expressing actual legal reasons why this conviction should be overturned, I'm certainly willing to evaluate them based on NY Criminal Law and esp. the results of appeals.
I can tell you for sure that whini ...[text shortened]... ut the supposed political makeup of the jury is not a winning strategy in NY State criminal appeals.
@Sleepyguy saidThen it's strange you decided to post in this thread which seemed to invite comment on the appeals process in the Trump case.
I'm not interested in your legal opinions or evaluations. This is just hardball politics, and I would never expect anything to go Trump's way in New York.
But I guess you couldn't pass up an opportunity to parrot brainless right wing propaganda.
Trump apparently should have chosen a better venue to commit his felonies according to you.
@Mott-The-Hoople saidI represented hundreds of felony defendants in NY State.
“Actually, I am in NY Criminal Law, so I don't have to "pretend". “
which side?
So, you ARE NOT a lawyer?
That makes me an "expert" according to the usual definitions:
"ex·â€‹pert ˈek-ËŒspÉ™rt ik-ˈspÉ™rt
1
: having, involving, or displaying special skill or knowledge derived from training or experience"
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/expert
But hey I don't care if you believe that or not.
@no1marauder said“Then it's strange you decided to post in this thread which seemed to invite comment on the appeals process in the Trump case.”
Then it's strange you decided to post in this thread which seemed to invite comment on the appeals process in the Trump case.
But I guess you couldn't pass up an opportunity to parrot brainless right wing propaganda.
This thread is to speculate on if the case will be overturned.
Its yes or no…or in your case…scared
@Mott-The-Hoople saidYou do realize this is a "Debates" Forum, don't you?
“Then it's strange you decided to post in this thread which seemed to invite comment on the appeals process in the Trump case.”
This thread is to speculate on if the case will be overturned.
Its yes or no…or in your case…scared