21 Aug '10 18:30>
http://www.glennbeck.com/content/articles/article/198/44513/
any thoughts?
any thoughts?
Originally posted by generalissimoYes, the only evil the progressives have brought this world is when they sold out to the Bourgeoisie and voted for Obamacare instead of national health care. Mark my words, this government run Obamacare system will fail, not because of government, but because of the evil insurance companies who are allowed to exist. Their very existence is incompatible with our individual freedoms and social justice. So when it fails you know what you must do, you must vote for the nationalization of health care. In fact, I don't know how we have all survived without it till now.
http://www.glennbeck.com/content/articles/article/198/44513/
any thoughts?
Originally posted by whodeywho are you and what have you done to whodey?
Yes, the only evil the progressives have brought this world is when they sold out to the Bourgeoisie and voted for Obamacare instead of national health care. Mark my words, this government run Obamacare system will fail, not because of government, but because of the evil insurance companies who are allowed to exist. Their very existence is incompatible with ...[text shortened]... nalization of health care. In fact, I don't know how we have all survived without it till now.
Originally posted by whodeyObama Care doesn't exist. And if any party has sold out to the bourgeosie it is certainly the GOP.
Yes, the only evil the progressives have brought this world is when they sold out to the Bourgeoisie and voted for Obamacare instead of national health care. Mark my words, this government run Obamacare system will fail, not because of government, but because of the evil insurance companies who are allowed to exist. Their very existence is incompatible with ...[text shortened]... nalization of health care. In fact, I don't know how we have all survived without it till now.
Originally posted by badmoonhttp://www.newsmax.com/InsideCover/Kucinich-healthcare-olbermann-vote/2010/03/09/id/352127
Obama Care doesn't exist. And if any party has sold out to the bourgeosie it is certainly the GOP.
Otherwise, I agree with your sentiments.
Originally posted by whodeyGood to see that the fake whodey is just as much of a liar as the real one. Kucinich has explained his vote many times; here's an article from Equire where he discusses it at length: http://www.esquire.com/the-side/qa/dennis-kucinich-health-care-bill-032210
http://www.newsmax.com/InsideCover/Kucinich-healthcare-olbermann-vote/2010/03/09/id/352127
Here is Dennis the Menace Kucinich as he first correctly assessed Obamacare. "The insurance companies are the problem, and we are giving them a version of a bail out. It will not control premiums, forcing people to buy private health care insurance."
However, ...[text shortened]... and conversing with that blue dog Christian Obama with no explanation for his change of heart.
Originally posted by no1marauderThanks for sharing. Here is Kucinich's explanation.
Good to see that the fake whodey is just as much of a liar as the real one. Kucinich has explained his vote many times; here's an article from Equire where he discusses it at length: http://www.esquire.com/the-side/qa/dennis-kucinich-health-care-bill-032210
Originally posted by whodeyAn admission that you lied about Kucinich giving "no explanation" for his change of vote would have been nice.
Thanks for sharing. Here is Kucinich's explanation.
"My decision came last Tuesday morning. There is a place where I go in the Capital, just to kind of reflect -- before I have to make very important decisions. It is in the rotunda -- right next to Lincoln's statue. It is just a bench. And I went over there early Tuesday morning about seven in the mor ...[text shortened]... buy health insurance and watch the single payer system ride in to save the day I suppose.
Originally posted by whodeyYes. The "with no explanation" claim did strike a false note and is all the more curious after you then went and cut & pasted his explanation. So when you said he voted the way he did "with no explanation" were you just making it up?
we all know [Kucinich ] switched his vote at the last minute [...] with no explanation for his change of heart.
Originally posted by FMFI pasted his explanation. Now everyone can read it and assess for themselves if it was a valid explanation. As for myself, "saving the Obama Presidency" is not a valid explanation. He made it clear that his previous critiques about out of control insurance premiums were not withdrawn, yet he then expects us to swallow the notion that it was "good" for the country?
[b]Yes. The "with no explanation" claim did strike a false note and is all the more curious after you then went and cut & pasted his explanation. So when you said he voted the way he did "with no explanation" were you just making it up?
Originally posted by FMFBut both you and Marauder think that a national health care system is better yet you both sit here and defend a man who has no explanation for selling the American people into the pocket books of the Bourgeoisie other than to say that he wishes to save the Obama Presidency?
You said he had "no explanation". You should just apologize, whodey, when you post these kinds of things. Just apologize and move on.
Originally posted by whodeyI'm sorry, whodey.
But both you and Marauder think that a national health care system is better yet you both sit here and defend a man who has no explanation for selling the American people into the pocket books of the Bourgeoisie other than to say that he wishes to save the Obama Presidency? I offer no apology, but perhaps you two might think about giving one.
Originally posted by whodeyYou are either very misinformed or deliberately disingenuous. Progressives by and large do not support a "national health care system" if you mean a NHS like the UK; they support a single payer system.
But both you and Marauder think that a national health care system is better yet you both sit here and defend a man who has no explanation for selling the American people into the pocket books of the Bourgeoisie other than to say that he wishes to save the Obama Presidency?
I offer no apology, but perhaps you two might think about giving one.