Go back
Good News!

Good News!

Debates

s

At the Revolution

Joined
15 Sep 07
Moves
5073
Clock
24 Jun 09
Vote Up
Vote Down

Iran's Ayatollah says that the election results are final, and the winner is:

MAHMOUD AHMADINEJAD

http://www.reuters.com/article/worldNews/idUSTRE55F54520090624

g

Pepperland

Joined
30 May 07
Moves
12892
Clock
24 Jun 09
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by scherzo
Iran's Ayatollah says that the election results are final, and the winner is:

MAHMOUD AHMADINEJAD

http://www.reuters.com/article/worldNews/idUSTRE55F54520090624
How is that good news?

Is it good that the rest of the world will have to cope with the anti-semitic-pinhead-buffon for the next years?

yeah, I guess its good for you to see that the deaths of protesters were in vain, and that nothing will change in the iranian theocracy.

sh76
Civis Americanus Sum

New York

Joined
26 Dec 07
Moves
17585
Clock
24 Jun 09
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by scherzo
Iran's Ayatollah says that the election results are final, and the winner is:

MAHMOUD AHMADINEJAD

http://www.reuters.com/article/worldNews/idUSTRE55F54520090624
If the Ayatollah gets to make these determinations unilaterally, then why bother having elections? If fact, why bother having a President? It's a theocracy anyway.

I feel bad for the people of Iran. Whether you support Ahmadinejad or the challenger, whether you believe in a hard line with the West or rapproachment, whether you believe in seeking nukes or not, whether you believe in peace with Israel or war...

it must suck to live in a theocracy of any kind.

s

At the Revolution

Joined
15 Sep 07
Moves
5073
Clock
24 Jun 09
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by sh76
If the Ayatollah gets to make these determinations unilaterally, then why bother having elections? If fact, why bother having a President? It's a theocracy anyway.

I feel bad for the people of Iran. Whether you support Ahmadinejad or the challenger, whether you believe in a hard line with the West or rapproachment, whether you believe in seeking nukes or not ...[text shortened]... you believe in peace with Israel or war...

it must suck to live in a theocracy of any kind.
Better than the Shah. See my previous post.

b
Enigma

Seattle

Joined
03 Sep 06
Moves
3298
Clock
24 Jun 09
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by scherzo
Iran's Ayatollah says that the election results are final, and the winner is:

MAHMOUD AHMADINEJAD

http://www.reuters.com/article/worldNews/idUSTRE55F54520090624
Meet the new boss...Same as the old boss. 😏

sh76
Civis Americanus Sum

New York

Joined
26 Dec 07
Moves
17585
Clock
24 Jun 09
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by scherzo
Better than the Shah. See my previous post.
Better neither. Better some sort of representative Democracy/Republic or anything other than one guy ruling an entire country based on his interpretation of a 1,500 year old book.

M

Joined
08 Oct 08
Moves
5542
Clock
24 Jun 09
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by scherzo
Iran's Ayatollah says that the election results are final, and the winner is:

MAHMOUD AHMADINEJAD

http://www.reuters.com/article/worldNews/idUSTRE55F54520090624
the only winner so far in Iran has been Twitter

M

Joined
08 Oct 08
Moves
5542
Clock
24 Jun 09
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by scherzo
Better than the Shah. See my previous post.
surely you can set a higher standard than "being better than the Shah"

s

At the Revolution

Joined
15 Sep 07
Moves
5073
Clock
24 Jun 09
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by sh76
Better neither. Better some sort of representative Democracy/Republic or anything other than one guy ruling an entire country based on his interpretation of a 1,500 year old book.
As opposed to a 2,000 year-old book? Or 2,500?

s

At the Revolution

Joined
15 Sep 07
Moves
5073
Clock
24 Jun 09
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Melanerpes
surely you can set a higher standard than "being better than the Shah"
Being willing to speak out against the Zionist machine.

sh76
Civis Americanus Sum

New York

Joined
26 Dec 07
Moves
17585
Clock
24 Jun 09
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by scherzo
As opposed to a 2,000 year-old book? Or 2,500?
uh... no

You obviously missed my point completely. Any type of theocracy is bad; whether it be a Muslim, Christian, Jewish, Budhist, Hindu or any other one.

sh76
Civis Americanus Sum

New York

Joined
26 Dec 07
Moves
17585
Clock
24 Jun 09
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by scherzo
Being willing to speak out against the Zionist machine.
Is that the lens through which you see every politician and political organization on Earth?

s

At the Revolution

Joined
15 Sep 07
Moves
5073
Clock
25 Jun 09
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by sh76
Is that the lens through which you see every politician and political organization on Earth?
No, not at all.

But it always helps.

Rajk999
Kali

PenTesting

Joined
04 Apr 04
Moves
261326
Clock
25 Jun 09
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by scherzo
No, not at all.

But it always helps.
Then you mind is screwed. Youre damaged goods.
But you are a typical Palestinian.
Typical Palestinians are therefore screwed up and irreversibly so.
Go IDF .. take them out !! ...😀

M

Joined
08 Oct 08
Moves
5542
Clock
25 Jun 09
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by scherzo
Being willing to speak out against the Zionist machine.
I say we get the Zionist Machine and the Hamas Machine and put them in some sort of technology museum where we can admire how shiny they are.

Then we get the actual Jewish and Palestinian people together for a long session of kumbayah 😀

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.