Originally posted by scherzoHow is that good news?
Iran's Ayatollah says that the election results are final, and the winner is:
MAHMOUD AHMADINEJAD
http://www.reuters.com/article/worldNews/idUSTRE55F54520090624
Is it good that the rest of the world will have to cope with the anti-semitic-pinhead-buffon for the next years?
yeah, I guess its good for you to see that the deaths of protesters were in vain, and that nothing will change in the iranian theocracy.
Originally posted by scherzoIf the Ayatollah gets to make these determinations unilaterally, then why bother having elections? If fact, why bother having a President? It's a theocracy anyway.
Iran's Ayatollah says that the election results are final, and the winner is:
MAHMOUD AHMADINEJAD
http://www.reuters.com/article/worldNews/idUSTRE55F54520090624
I feel bad for the people of Iran. Whether you support Ahmadinejad or the challenger, whether you believe in a hard line with the West or rapproachment, whether you believe in seeking nukes or not, whether you believe in peace with Israel or war...
it must suck to live in a theocracy of any kind.
Originally posted by sh76Better than the Shah. See my previous post.
If the Ayatollah gets to make these determinations unilaterally, then why bother having elections? If fact, why bother having a President? It's a theocracy anyway.
I feel bad for the people of Iran. Whether you support Ahmadinejad or the challenger, whether you believe in a hard line with the West or rapproachment, whether you believe in seeking nukes or not ...[text shortened]... you believe in peace with Israel or war...
it must suck to live in a theocracy of any kind.
Originally posted by scherzoI say we get the Zionist Machine and the Hamas Machine and put them in some sort of technology museum where we can admire how shiny they are.
Being willing to speak out against the Zionist machine.
Then we get the actual Jewish and Palestinian people together for a long session of kumbayah 😀