1 edit
Originally posted by lordsquirePoint one: BUSh hasn't really tried to pass any bills hes just made ludicruss suggestions to make al gore seem like the bad guy when he refuses them
Why the f@&% do people think Bush is that bad? Al Gore is the true menace!
Point one: Gore says that he cares about the enviroment. And Bush tried to pass all kinds of bills to help with the enviroment, like the Cleaner Air Initiative, and turning northern Hawaii (still sketchy on where, but Hawaii) into a marine haven. Gore 'wasn't able to enforce' e. The ice won't melt, stop worrying. Gore's one standpoint, is a sham.
Who agrees?
Point two:There are alternatives in the film, like they say its part of the natural cycle, and he debates all of them, and whats being force fed to children without any alternative is religion(im very passionate on this view)not by schools but by parents, anything told to children under 5 will be beleived no matter what and w ill not be questioned, its like their sponge perioid.
Point three: He has made countless bad decisions, but the war in irag is the biggest, even after he declared the war was won, only 75,000 innocent lives have been lost, no biggey, I mean comeone there is a reason all comedians thrive around george bush, after millions of dollars are being spent on national security and millions more being suggested, what does he almost die on, a freaking potatoe chip, can you imagine that!
Point four: that is complete bull, antartica is about 5+ of the worlds landmass above water and only 8% of an iceburg is above water, don't you get it, it will rise about 40-50 feet, america is only on average 16 metres above sea level, its hill will survive but what else, the whole ecosystem will be serverly damaged, if you don't want the story of noahs arc to actually happen because of your ignorance then for gods sakes look at the facts!
Originally posted by knightistwoqueensWell we luck out on that one... which 50% did he get? I bet he had less than that.
well Gore probably should have actually won because he got 50% of states and im sure there were other candidates, and there was enough confusion for a recount
Originally posted by knightistwoqueensHoly crap!.. hey.... why are YOU still using electricity to write that post... do you want to drown.
Point one: BUSh hasn't really tried to pass any bills hes just made ludicruss suggestions to make al gore seem like the bad guy when he refuses them
Point two:There are alternatives in the film, like they say its part of the natural cycle, and he debates all of them, and whats being force fed to children without any alternative is religion(im ve ...[text shortened]... noahs arc to actually happen because of your ignorance then for gods sakes look at the facts!
Originally posted by wittywonkai agree at first i though goddangit bush is president but now the australian dollar is catchting up to yours so hey i don't care anymore!
Faults Against Gore:
(Just to humor you)
Global Warming (Controversy*)
*(Entailing bias, etc.)
Faults Against Bush:
Invading Iraq Failure (mainly for oil)
Education Failure (No Child Left Behind)
Economic Failure
Disrupting the entire Middle East region
etc., etc., etc.
Originally posted by lordsquirehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Northwestern_Hawaiian_Islands
Why the f@&% do people think Bush is that bad? Al Gore is the true menace!
Point one: Gore says that he cares about the enviroment. And Bush tried to pass all kinds of bills to help with the enviroment, like the Cleaner Air Initiative, and turning northern Hawaii (still sketchy on where, but Hawaii) into a marine haven. Gore 'wasn't able to enforce' ...[text shortened]... e. The ice won't melt, stop worrying. Gore's one standpoint, is a sham.
Who agrees?
(from)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_W._Bush
"In 2006, Bush declared the Northwestern Hawaiian Islands a national monument, creating the largest marine reserve to date. It comprises 84 million acres (340,000 km²ðŸ˜‰ and is home to 7,000 species of fish, birds and other marine animals, many of which are specific to only those islands.[69] The move was hailed by conservationists for "its foresight and leadership in protecting this incredible area."[70]"