Go back
Gun Owners Without Borders

Gun Owners Without Borders

Debates

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down

Normally I'm not much of a joiner, but here's an organization I think I could really get behind:

http://mensnewsdaily.com/2007/08/28/gun-owners-without-borders/

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by der schwarze Ritter
Normally I'm not much of a joiner, but here's an organization I think I could really get behind:

http://mensnewsdaily.com/2007/08/28/gun-owners-without-borders/
I like that you post stuff like this just to make the tranzies go bonkers.

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by der schwarze Ritter
Normally I'm not much of a joiner, but here's an organization I think I could really get behind:

http://mensnewsdaily.com/2007/08/28/gun-owners-without-borders/
Third paragraph...

"Gun Owners Without Borders supports an inalienable right of people to resist any attempts to exterminate them, regardless of the source or justification for the attempted extermination."

So you agree with the idea of a guy about to be arrested and most likely put to death because he decided to, I dunno, kill a load of school kids, shooting at the police who are trying to arrest him? You view that as his inalienable right?

Come on, stop trolling.

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by agryson
Third paragraph...

"Gun Owners Without Borders supports an inalienable right of people to resist any attempts to exterminate them, regardless of the source or justification for the attempted extermination."

So you agree with the idea of a guy about to be arrested and most likely put to death because he decided to, I dunno, kill a load of school kids, s ...[text shortened]... o are trying to arrest him? You view that as his inalienable right?

Come on, stop trolling.
Incidentally, the concept of "rights" is a bit messed up anyway. More a case of interlocking duties IMO.

Clock
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Ahem, and like Old Faithful, the first one appears. I am proven correct. 😉

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Merk
Ahem, and like Old Faithful, the first one appears. I am proven correct. 😉
Indeed! Count on me to be the first to be first in line! lol

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by der schwarze Ritter
Normally I'm not much of a joiner, but here's an organization I think I could really get behind:

http://mensnewsdaily.com/2007/08/28/gun-owners-without-borders/
It didn't give an address where I can send my extra guns.

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down

Let's give a gun to every child, woman and man in Iraq.

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Palynka
Let's give a gun to every child, woman and man in Iraq.
It is their inalienable human right after all...

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down

You want the terrorists to have guns?

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Palynka
Let's give a gun to every child, woman and man in Iraq.
That would be fine, if they don't already own one. They should be able to defend themselves against whoever is after them. It shouldn't matter if they are against their government or with their government.

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by lepomis
That would be fine, if they don't already own one. They should be able to defend themselves against whoever is after them. It shouldn't matter if they are against their government or with their government.
Yeah..............
I'm going to back away from this thread........
Slowly.

Sorry, but it's not doing much to dispel the notion of Yanks as gun toting nuts....

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by agryson
Yeah..............
I'm going to back away from this thread........
Slowly.

Sorry, but it's not doing much to dispel the notion of Yanks as gun toting nuts....
I don't think anyone was trying to dispel it.

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by lepomis
I don't think anyone was trying to dispel it.
Maybe, I just saw it as a very sincere "call to arms" if you will. Since it's a nutty idea, and my interpretation was that this site was trying to reduce the nutty factor, I was inferring that I don't think it's doing its job. If however I'm misinterpreting a facetious link as a serious statement of belief in the right to bear arms as being a universal human one, then carry on and I should lighten up a bit.

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by agryson
Maybe, I just saw it as a very sincere "call to arms" if you will. Since it's a nutty idea, and my interpretation was that this site was trying to reduce the nutty factor, I was inferring that I don't think it's doing its job. If however I'm misinterpreting a facetious link as a serious statement of belief in the right to bear arms as being a universal human one, then carry on and I should lighten up a bit.
Oh sure, it's a little tongue-in-cheek....... a little 🙂

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.