Go back
Happy first 100 days

Happy first 100 days

Debates

2 edits


-Removed-
Ah yes P&O the ‘fire and hire’ poster boys, if that deal involved public money I hope it’s been torpedoed to the bottom of the channel. There will be nothing in it for British workers anyway. P&O prefer smuggling in workers from Indonesia and paying them Indonesian wage rate.



-Removed-
Why did Tories lose by a landslide? Was it because they were the better party?

All your posts imply voting Labor was the wrong choice, when that couldn't be farther from the truth. Fourteen years of conservative rule convinced voters Tories need to go.

No matter how bad Labor is doing, voters agreed by a WIDE margin they were the lesser of two evils.

So stop implying a mistake was made by voting Labor instead Tory. Labor has to try and clean up almost two decades of Tory dung heaps.



-Removed-
You're not getting the point.

For years, you've never said a word about the government until Labor won. To be so vocal now after being silent on the the embarrassment of Boris and Truss, May's inability to to craft a decent Brexit deal, so on and so forth.

Being vocal now means that you intend to be partisan instead of object. This is tiresome; we get enough of this from American conservatives. Discussing UK politics should be a refreshing change but it's more of the same things you non-Americans despites about U.S. politics; misinformation, propaganda, etc.

For example: you made a post falsely accusing Labor of "hard-left socialism" while being unable to provide even one instance of it. You also misrepresented fuel payment cuts by falsely implying lower-income elders would be affected.

Another thread: you accused Labor of a "nanny state". Why? Because they said they'd "look" into a matter about ticket prices. That was it. No threats were made, no criticisms offered, just a statement they'd look. This alone was enough for you to go into an unhinged rant about a "nanny state" as if Labor was running a dictatorship. Labor took no action regarding ticket prices, making your rant took even more idiotic.

Now on this thread, you make silly claims like one person's opinion being equal to the whole government sharing that opinion. In democratic society, that's a stupid claim to make. Lee Anderson said London's Muslim mayor gave control to radical Islamists; by your logic, that was the official position of the government?

I'm just so sick of these brain-dead conservative tactics. It seems you're all the same no matter what country you're from; whether from New Zealand like Wajoma, South America like Rajk, the UK like yourself, or from the U.S., you all sound the same. Your only purpose in this forum is spread propaganda and ignore the failings of your own side.



-Removed-
So no acknowledgement of your multiple false, uniformed statements, just more partisan preening.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Vote Up
Vote Down

-Removed-
Conservative tactic #342: pretend actions you're now embarrassed about never happened.

Regarding your OP, stating a transport minister's words represents the whole government is like stating Lee Anderson's bigoted statements represented the whole government. More dumb arguments that you'll deny you ever said in the future.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Vote Up
Vote Down

Vote Up
Vote Down

-Removed-
The anti-socialism, anti-immigration, anti-Muslim, anti-Labor poster claims he's not conservative.

Add "conservative" to the growing list of words you don't understand, like "socialism", "evidence" and "nanny state".

Vote Up
Vote Down

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

-Removed-
It was the first word of the sentence, per the rules of English grammar.