@sonhouse saidYou didn't have evidence Trump stole the election from HRC either, but you were a puppet for her and believed that conspiracy theory. DUH!
@Metal-Brain
Of course not, he is a puppet for Trump DUH.
@Metal-Brain
The GOOD thing is YOU are irrelevant, a pathetic outlier like the monkey on the furthest out branch going I Can't hear you, my ears are covered.
- Joined
- 27 Sep 06
- Moves
- 251103
@metal-brain saidPlease stop sourcing these bogus sites/
Packing corrupt judges by the POTUS isn't new.
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2007/03/surprise-clinton-fired-all-93-us-attorneys-in-1993/
QUESTIONABLE SOURCE ---FAKE NEWS
Overall, we rate The Gateway Pundit Questionable based on extreme right-wing bias, promotion of conspiracies, and numerous instances of publishing false (fake) news.
``````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/the-gateway-pundit/
- Joined
- 27 Sep 06
- Moves
- 251103
@sonhouse saidsonhouse,
@Metal-Brain
The GOOD thing is YOU are irrelevant, a pathetic outlier like the monkey on the furthest out branch going I Can't hear you, my ears are covered.
Don't beat around the bush,
tell us what you think of him.
@jimm619 said‘Media Bias/Fact Check’ Site Served With Cease And Desist, Gets Fact-Checked
Please stop sourcing these bogus sites/
QUESTIONABLE SOURCE ---FAKE NEWS
Overall, we rate The Gateway Pundit Questionable based on extreme right-wing bias, promotion of conspiracies, and numerous instances of publishing false (fake) news.
``````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/the-gateway-pundit/
https://climatechangedispatch.com/media-bias-fact-check-site-served-cease-and-desist/
Awww.....did your favorite fake fact checker get slammed with the law for lying?
- Joined
- 27 Sep 06
- Moves
- 251103
@metal-brain saidSays who???????????????????????????
You didn't have evidence Trump stole the election from HRC either, but you were a puppet for her and believed that conspiracy theory. DUH!
- Joined
- 27 Sep 06
- Moves
- 251103
1 edit
@metal-brain saidYOU'RE A FUNNY GUY, THERE IS NO LEGAL ACTION PENDING
‘Media Bias/Fact Check’ Site Served With Cease And Desist, Gets Fact-Checked
https://climatechangedispatch.com/media-bias-fact-check-site-served-cease-and-desist/
Awww.....did your favorite fake fact checker get slammed with the law for lying?
THESE ARE BOTH FAKE NEWS SITES
Factual Reporting: Low - Not Credible - Not Reliable - Fake News - Bias
CONSPIRACY-PSEUDOSCIENCE------FAKE NEWS
Sources in the Conspiracy-Pseudoscience category may publish unverifiable information that is not always supported by evidence. These sources may be untrustworthy for credible/verifiable information; therefore, fact-checking and further investigation is recommended on a per article basis when obtaining information from these sources. See all Conspiracy-Pseudoscience sources.
Overall, we rate Climate Change Dispatch as a Conspiracy and Quackery
level Pseudoscience source for the promotion of false or misleading information that is not in line with the consensus of science and several failed fact checks.
Overall, we rate Climate Change Dispatch as a Conspiracy and Quackery level Pseudoscience source for the promotion of false or misleading information that is not in line with the consensus of science and several failed fact checks.
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/climate-change-dispatch/
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
World Net Daily
A questionable source exhibits one or one of the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion or propaganda/conspiracies, poor or no sourcing to credible information, a complete lack of transparency, and/or is fake news. Fake News is the deliberate attempt to publish hoaxes and/or disinformation for profit or influence (Learn More). Sources listed in the Questionable Category may be very untrustworthy and should be fact-checked on a per-article basis. Please note sources on this list are not considered fake news unless specifically written in the reasoning section for that source. See all Questionable sources.
QUESTIONABLE SOURCE------FAKE NEWS
Overall, we rate WND Questionable based on extreme right-wing bias, promotion of conspiracy theories, and numerous failed fact checks.
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/world-net-daily-wnd/
@jimm619 saidSTOP LYING!
YOU'RE A FUNNY GUY, THERE IS NO LEGAL ACTION PENDING
Factual Reporting: Low - Not Credible - Not Reliable - Fake News - Bias
CONSPIRACY-PSEUDOSCIENCE------FAKE NEWS
Sources in the Conspiracy-Pseudoscience category may publish unverifiable information that is not always supported by evidence. These sources may be untrustworthy for credible/verifiable information; therefore, ...[text shortened]... of science and several failed fact checks.
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/climate-change-dispatch/
Principia Scientific International also served your favorite discredited self-proclaimed ‘fact checker’ website with a ‘cease and desist’ legal notice for publishing unsubstantiated and defamatory claims against Principia Scientific International (PSI).
Below we help readers to fact-check the pseudo-fact-checker. We put Dave Van Zandt the faceless fact-checker under the microscope and discovered the following:
Van Zandt Cites No Scientific Qualifications At All
Van Zandt Was Exposed By WND As A Fraud And A Liar
Van Zandt’s Website (MBFC) Does Not Apply Any Objective Scientific Method
MBFC Relies On Unverifiable Subjectivity (Own Bias) To Make Judgments
https://principia-scientific.com/media-bias-fact-check-site-fails-psi-fact-check/
"In a 2017 WND Exclusive ‘Phony baloney: The 9 fakest fake-news checkers’, Chelsea Schilling uncovered that Van Zandt was a seasoned systemic faker. She wrote:
“WND was unable to locate a single article with Van Zandt’s byline. Ironically, the “fact checker” fails to establish his own credibility by disclosing his qualifications and training in evaluating news sources.
Asked for information concerning his expertise in the field of journalism and evaluating news sources, Van Zandt told WND: “I am not a journalist and just a person who is interested in how media bias impacts politics. You will find zero claims of expertise on the website.”
Concerning his purported “25+ years” of experience writing for print and web media, he said: “I am not sure why the 25+ years is still on the website.”
2 edits
@vivify saidIt is not us ‘calling ‘ them anything,,,,but we are stating the facts, if you please. Drugs (fentamyl is killing Americans ). and rape (the basterds are using children and women). It is sickening to communicate with disingenuous people such as you.
Is it conservatives or liberals calling Mexican immigrants drug-using rapists?
Is it conservatives or liberals who called for a ban on all Muslims?
Is it liberals trying to make it legal to deny gays from buying cakes?
Were liberals the ones who stormed a government building to stop the peaceful transfer of power?
Was it conservatives or liberals who elected a president who said he'd kill the families of suspected terrorists?
Conservatives are full of crap.
We had good reason to ban muslims. But then ole AvJoe would have rounded up every jap in 1941, too. Get Marauder to show you how to find links on interment camps. Do y’all think Marauder is a real person? Like, a human? I think someone, maybe our moderators , is pulling wool over our eyes.
So SCOTUS ruled incorrectly on the man who wouldnt put a same sex hookup on a cake, due to his religion? What should they have done? Here’s Vivify laying down the law.
Jury still out on Jan 6 deal. I did see a lib there on Jan 6. A guy (i think) Had on the cute jeans with the requisite tear in the knee. So, to answer your question, there was this guy with his husband there, 2 libs, so you are wrong to imply no libs were there,
Y’alls posts are getting frazzled. I just hate it.
Who said they would kill the families of suspected terrorists. You’ll have to give us a link. Hope its not a Suzianne-ism where she says a guy told a lie but doesn’t tell us the lie!!
I get so 😡 😠angry
- Joined
- 27 Sep 06
- Moves
- 251103
1 edit
@metal-brain saidWND says that WND is the ONLY trustworthy site
STOP LYING!
Principia Scientific International also served your favorite discredited self-proclaimed ‘fact checker’ website with a ‘cease and desist’ legal notice for publishing unsubstantiated and defamatory claims against Principia Scientific International (PSI).
Below we help readers to fact-check the pseudo-fact-checker. We put Dave Van Zandt the faceless fact-che ...[text shortened]... writing for print and web media, he said: “I am not sure why the 25+ years is still on the website.”
Principia Scientific International is MORE FAKE NEWS
CONSPIRACY-PSEUDOSCIENCE
Overall, we rate Principia Scientific International (PSI) a strong conspiracy and Pseudosciencewebsite promoting anti-vaccine propaganda and frequent misinformation regarding climate change
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/principia-scientific-international/
- Joined
- 27 Sep 06
- Moves
- 251103
2 edits
@averagejoe1 saidWHO????????????
It is not us ‘calling ‘ them anything,,,,but we are stating the facts, if you please. Drugs (fentamyl is killing Americans ). and rape (the basterds are using children and women). It is sickening to communicate with disingenuous people such as you.
We had good reason to ban muslims. But then ole AvJoe would have rounded up every jap in 1941, too. Get Marauder to ...[text shortened]... a Suzianne-ism where she says a guy told a lie but doesn’t tell us the lie!!
I get so 😡 😠angry
WHO IS DOING ALL THIS
YOU want a link?
Why are you angry?
Give us a link to these FENTAMYL KILLERS
AND THE RAPISTS.........
Call yourself a patriot?
Thankfully, the courts don't agree.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
BTW, I think Maurauder1 will find it
hard to believe that he doesn't exist.