Go back
High-risk patients may be stuck paying high rates

High-risk patients may be stuck paying high rates

Debates

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Hugh Glass
Tam - I'm in a special foreclosure prevention program through my county. If my SSDI doesn't come through by August, hopefully, we'll be able to get the sheriff's sale postponed again (it was previously scheduled for May 3rd). My mortgage company has asked me if I'm interested in a short sale, but right now, with my kids in school and a new baby due in N ll take 'em.


Here, a post from a MS forum,, how did Obama help her? FMF? Anyone?
This is about as tawdry as it gets, Hugh. Were there any hard luck stories before Obama? What's the "left" "right" of MS in HughWorld?

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by FMF
Your comments here seem to indicate that you were one of them. The reform has been passed but has it kicked in yet? It extends access to affordable health care to 30,000,000 people. If that is all the reform achieves, then it is to be welcomed in place of when 30,000,000 people had less access than they do now.

[b]"think chronic disease hits only the left? o ...[text shortened]... ver referred to the political leanings of patients. In fact I don't think anyone has.
where are you getting this 30,000,000 figure from?!

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by utherpendragon
where are you getting this 30,000,000 figure from?!
From the debate. From one of yours or whodey's cut and pastes perhaps.

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by FMF
From the debate. From one of yours or whodey's cut and pastes perhaps.
ah the cardinal sin of debating, relying on assumtion that one has correct information,,, you'd think a man of your high intelligence would know better,, perhaps your a fool? fact check before you write.

twiddling his fingers waiting for a decent reply, which has only a snowballs chance in hell of being sent

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Hugh Glass
ah the cardinal sin of debating, relying on assumtion that one has correct information,,, you'd think a man of your high intelligence would know better,, perhaps your a fool? fact check before you write.

twiddling his fingers waiting for a decent reply, which has only a snowballs chance in hell of being sent
Agreed! "Perhaps" fmf should back up his/her claims w/ facts.

Vote Up
Vote Down

well, I figured as much....

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by utherpendragon
Agreed! "Perhaps" fmf should back up his/her claims w/ facts.
Don't confuse him. He is the author of a recent post in response to a similar request for authenticated facts which read "I have travelled the world, man".
Surely that says it all.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by utherpendragon
where are you getting this 30,000,000 figure from?!
I think the figure is in fact 33 million by 2019.

A majority of which would be children as far as I know, so we are not talking about 33 million taxpayers.

The prediction comes from the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. You need to have a look at pages 6 and 7.
http://www.politico.com/static/PPM110_091211_financial_impact.html

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by FMF
I think the figure is in fact 33 million by 2019.

A majority of which would be children as far as I know, so we are not talking about 33 million taxpayers.

The prediction comes from the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. You need to have a look at pages 6 and 7.
http://www.politico.com/static/PPM110_091211_financial_impact.html
33 million by 2019??
ouch, lets hope the plan helps.

Tks