1. Joined
    02 Jan '06
    Moves
    12857
    28 Mar '10 13:08
    I forgot to mention that the Dems recently approved the subsidized reimbersement for viagra for pediphiles.

    http;//townhall.com/columnist/JillianBands/2010/03/25/dems_subsidize_perscription-strenght_sex_enhancent_medication_for_child_rapists

    Won't you all join with me in condemning this?

    You know, I guess as long as you have power and wealth, you can do pretty much anything you desire. Isn't that right Michael Jackson?
  2. Subscriberkmax87
    Blade Runner
    Republicants
    Joined
    09 Oct '04
    Moves
    105292
    28 Mar '10 16:351 edit
    Originally posted by whodey
    Isn't that right Michael Jackson?
    ..unless you're into channeling, Michael can't come to the phone right now..
  3. Standard memberDrKF
    incipit parodia
    Joined
    01 Aug '07
    Moves
    46580
    28 Mar '10 16:501 edit
    How sad, whodey, that your parochial manichaeism means you haven't a single word to say about an apparent conspiracy within the Catholic church to cover up paedophilia on a massive scale. Not a word of condemnation, not a word of protest, not a word of sympathy for the victims.

    ("Ow-ah, ow-ah, not fayur - you haven't said anything about my examples. nyaaaa nyaaa" )
  4. Standard memberSeitse
    Doug Stanhope
    That's Why I Drink
    Joined
    01 Jan '06
    Moves
    33672
    28 Mar '10 17:12
    Originally posted by DrKF
    parochial manichaeism
    Proverbial!

    I love this expression. Every time I read it I can't help but to
    think about the fierce googling it triggers in the philistines.
  5. Pepperland
    Joined
    30 May '07
    Moves
    12892
    28 Mar '10 18:47
    Its obvious the church needs urgent reform and change in the way it treats criminals. The pope has to resign, there is no other way.

    Its shameful that the church has covered up years of abuse, it is simply inexcusable. But I have hope that justice will ultimately prevail.
  6. Joined
    02 Jan '06
    Moves
    12857
    29 Mar '10 03:051 edit
    Originally posted by generalissimo
    Its obvious the church needs urgent reform and change in the way it treats criminals. The pope has to resign, there is no other way.

    Its shameful that the church has covered up years of abuse, it is simply inexcusable. But I have hope that justice will ultimately prevail.
    Have the Pope resign? There is as much chance of that as there is someone like Michael Jackson turning himself in or the President of the United States resigning. Why on earth would they give up all that power and wealth?

    You are right about one thing, justice will eventually prevail. God help these guys who do these things in the name of God. In this respect, they are the worst of the worst and will have to answer for it someday before God.
  7. Joined
    28 Oct '05
    Moves
    34587
    29 Mar '10 03:27
    Originally posted by whodey
    You are right about one thing, justice will eventually prevail. God help these guys who do these things in the name of God. In this respect, they are the worst of the worst and will have to answer for it someday before God.
    In this context, talk of 'justice before God' is surely a vapid platitude. What about justice in the here and now? Any thoughts? Saying that "justice will eventually prevail" and then indicating that it will happen in the 'afterlife' is a completely irrelevant kind of alleged justice - and that's even assuming it is any kind of "justice" at all.
  8. Joined
    28 Oct '05
    Moves
    34587
    29 Mar '10 03:29
    Originally posted by whodey
    Have the Pope resign? [...] Why on earth would they give up all that power and wealth?
    Well, it could be argued that the Catholic Church's power and wealth is under threat. A lot of it could be taken away. Would the Pope resigning serve to head this off at the pass to any extent, I wonder.
  9. Joined
    02 Jan '06
    Moves
    12857
    29 Mar '10 03:43
    Originally posted by FMF
    In this context, talk of 'justice before God' is surely a vapid platitude. What about justice in the here and now? Any thoughts? Saying that "justice will eventually prevail" and then indicating that it will happen in the 'afterlife' is a completely irrelevant kind of alleged justice - and that's even assuming it is any kind of "justice" at all.
    Justice in this life is a noble effort, but is often lacking when it comes to the rich and powerful. So tell me, what justice did Michael Jackson recieve? What justice will Obama's czar recieve etc.? In fact, what good is vengence on these twisted souls other than to preven them from doing it again? How will it make up for what they have done?

    I don't make the rules FMF, I just observe and that is what I observe.
  10. Joined
    02 Jan '06
    Moves
    12857
    29 Mar '10 03:44
    Originally posted by FMF
    Well, it could be argued that the Catholic Church's power and wealth is under threat. A lot of it could be taken away. Would the Pope resigning serve to head this off at the pass to any extent, I wonder.
    Fat chance.
  11. Joined
    28 Oct '05
    Moves
    34587
    29 Mar '10 04:03
    Originally posted by whodey
    I don't make the rules FMF, I just observe and that is what I observe.
    You observe "justice" being served in the afterlife? How so?
  12. Joined
    28 Oct '05
    Moves
    34587
    29 Mar '10 04:041 edit
    Originally posted by whodey
    Fat chance.
    So your observation is that there are/will be no law suits against the Catholic Church?
  13. Standard memberSeitse
    Doug Stanhope
    That's Why I Drink
    Joined
    01 Jan '06
    Moves
    33672
    29 Mar '10 06:09
    There's only one solution: castration.
  14. Pepperland
    Joined
    30 May '07
    Moves
    12892
    29 Mar '10 16:58
    Originally posted by whodey
    Have the Pope resign? There is as much chance of that as there is someone like Michael Jackson turning himself in or the President of the United States resigning. Why on earth would they give up all that power and wealth?

    You are right about one thing, justice will eventually prevail. God help these guys who do these things in the name of God. In this respect, they are the worst of the worst and will have to answer for it someday before God.
    I find it very unlikely too, but considering he was directly involved in the cover-ups, resignation is only the right thing to do, furthermore, if he does not resign that will ony do further damage to the church.


    agreed.
  15. Joined
    13 Mar '07
    Moves
    48661
    29 Mar '10 18:00
    Originally posted by FMF
    That's right. He wanted to spend more time with his family, as I recall.
    Actually, Pope Celestine V, an octogenarian former hermit, resigned on realising he was too old, naive and saintly for the job. But his abdication led to the election of Boniface VIII (who may have talked Celestine into resignation, and indeed imprisoned his predecessor on succeeding to the Papacy). Along with the corruption and worldliness not untypical of medieval popes, Boniface was responsible for the violent sack of Palestrina, and for sending the poet Dante into exile. Dante got his revenge in the Divine Comedy by finding a space for Boniface in hell even though he hadn't died yet; and he also damned Celestine for allowing Boniface to take power, referring to the hapless old Pope as "he who through cowardice made the great refusal", and leaving him in the vestibule of hell, along with the rest of the "uncommitted": those who did nothing either for good or evil.

    I wonder where Dante would find space for Ratzinger.
Back to Top

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.I Agree