Go back
Hoverboard Hypothetical

Hoverboard Hypothetical

Debates

JS357

Joined
29 Dec 08
Moves
6788
Clock
21 Jan 16
2 edits
Vote Up
Vote Down

You are parents.
There are reports of hoverboard fires.
You are A. aware of them or B. unaware of them.
You give your daughter a hoverboard for Xmas.
The house mostly burns down.
Two loved dogs die.
The above happened (with the conditional A or B, either way).
Do you sue the manufacturer?
Is there contributory negligence on the part of the parents?

http://abc7news.com/news/hoverboard-blamed-for-santa-rosa-house-fire-that-killed-dogs/1166917/

twhitehead

Cape Town

Joined
14 Apr 05
Moves
52945
Clock
21 Jan 16
Vote Up
Vote Down

A neighbouring flat was burnt earlier this year, we believe due to leaving some electrical equipment turned on. I don't know the details. Am I now partly responsible if my flat burns down started by an electrical fault?

no1marauder
Naturally Right

Somewhere Else

Joined
22 Jun 04
Moves
42677
Clock
21 Jan 16
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by JS357
You are parents.
There are reports of hoverboard fires.
You are A. aware of them or B. unaware of them.
You give your daughter a hoverboard for Xmas.
The house mostly burns down.
Two loved dogs die.
The above happened (with the conditional A or B, either way).
Do you sue the manufacturer?
Is there contributory negligence on the part of the parents?

http://abc7news.com/news/hoverboard-blamed-for-santa-rosa-house-fire-that-killed-dogs/1166917/
Buying a defective product does not amount to "contributory negligence" IMO.

The hoverboard was being charged, malfunctioned and started a fire that devastated the family home and killed their two dogs. I'd say the chance of a lawsuit being filed is close to 100%.

n

The Catbird's Seat

Joined
21 Oct 06
Moves
2598
Clock
21 Jan 16
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by no1marauder
Buying a defective product does not amount to "contributory negligence" IMO.

The hoverboard was being charged, malfunctioned and started a fire that devastated the family home and killed their two dogs. I'd say the chance of a lawsuit being filed is close to 100%.
That's the deep pockets theory.

twhitehead

Cape Town

Joined
14 Apr 05
Moves
52945
Clock
21 Jan 16
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by JS357
You are parents.
There are reports of hoverboard fires.
I think the key question would be whether or not the hoverboard actually came with any warnings in its instructions. I don't think the existence of reports of fires in any way helps the manufacturers case in terms of reduced responsibility. If anything, quite the opposite. If the manufacturer was aware of these reports it should have either recalled the products and /or sent warnings to its customers.

sh76
Civis Americanus Sum

New York

Joined
26 Dec 07
Moves
17585
Clock
21 Jan 16
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by JS357
You are parents.
There are reports of hoverboard fires.
You are A. aware of them or B. unaware of them.
You give your daughter a hoverboard for Xmas.
The house mostly burns down.
Two loved dogs die.
The above happened (with the conditional A or B, either way).
Do you sue the manufacturer?
Is there contributory negligence on the part of the parents?

http://abc7news.com/news/hoverboard-blamed-for-santa-rosa-house-fire-that-killed-dogs/1166917/
Of course you sue the manufacturer. Why would you not? Liability in cases of mismanufacture like this is almost a foregone conclusion; the only question is damages.

If there were a big warning label on the box telling you about the risk of fire, then perhaps assumption of risk could be a defense.

JS357

Joined
29 Dec 08
Moves
6788
Clock
21 Jan 16
Vote Up
Vote Down

I smell a recall.

no1marauder
Naturally Right

Somewhere Else

Joined
22 Jun 04
Moves
42677
Clock
21 Jan 16
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by normbenign
That's the deep pockets theory.
No it isn't.

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.